Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25949214›Full record

ArticleProteome science2015

Comparative proteomics of Bt-transgenic and non-transgenic cotton leaves.

Limin Wang, Xuchu Wang, Xiang Jin, Ruizong Jia, Qixing Huang, Yanhua Tan, Anping Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteome science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Proteomic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating the effect ofJournal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2020
    Article
  12. CRISPR/Cas9 Directed Mutagenesis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. PeerJ · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Limin WangChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, The Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Haikou, Hainan 571101 China ; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, The Oilcrops Research Institute, Wuhan, 430062 China.
Xuchu WangChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, The Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Haikou, Hainan 571101 China.
Xiang JinChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, The Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Haikou, Hainan 571101 China.
Ruizong JiaChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, The Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Haikou, Hainan 571101 China.
Qixing HuangChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, The Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Haikou, Hainan 571101 China.
Yanhua TanChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, The Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Haikou, Hainan 571101 China.
Anping GuoChinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, The Institute of Tropical Biosciences and Biotechnology, Haikou, Hainan 571101 China.
Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the rapid growth of the commercialized acreage in genetically modified (GM) crops, the unintended effects of GM crops' biosafety assessment have been given much attention. To investigate whether transgenic events cause unintended effects, comparative proteomics of cotton leaves between the commercial transgenic Bt + CpTI cotton SGK321 (BT) clone and its non-transgenic parental counterpart SY321 wild type (WT) was performed.

resultsUsing enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), Cry1Ac toxin protein was detected in the BT leaves, while its content was only 0.31 pg/g. By 2-DE, 58 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were detected. Among them 35 were identified by MS. These identified DEPs were mainly involved in carbohydrate transport and metabolism, chaperones related to post-translational modification and energy production. Pathway analysis revealed that most of the DEPs were implicated in carbon fixation and photosynthesis, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, and oxidative pentose phosphate pathway. Thirteen identified proteins were involved in protein-protein interaction. The protein interactions were mainly involved in photosynthesis and energy metabolite pathway.

conclusionsOur study demonstrated that exogenous DNA in a host cotton genome can affect the plant growth and photosynthesis. Although some unintended variations of proteins were found between BT and WT cotton, no toxic proteins or allergens were detected. This study verified genetically modified operation did not sharply alter cotton leaf proteome, and the target proteins were hardly checked by traditional proteomic analysis.

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisComparative proteomicsCotton leafCry1Ac geneToxin proteinTransgenic plant

Identifiers

PMID25949214
PMCPMC4422549
OpenAlexW1999390021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.