Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948885›Full record

ReviewMediators of inflammation2015

Sterile inflammation in Drosophila.

Zeeshan Shaukat, Dawei Liu, Stephen Gregory

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mediators of inflammation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Inflammation and DNA damage: cause, effect or both.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2023
    Review
  14. Toxins · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zeeshan ShaukatSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.
Dawei LiuSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.
Stephen GregorySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5006, Australia.
University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of immune responses in Drosophila has already yielded significant results with impacts on our understanding of vertebrate immunity, such as the characterization of the Toll receptor. Several recent papers have focused on the humoral response to damage signals rather than pathogens, particularly damage signals from tumour-like tissues generated by loss of cell polarity or chromosomal instability. Both the triggers that generate this sterile inflammation and the systemic and local effects of it are only just beginning to be characterized in Drosophila. Here we review the molecular mechanisms that are known that give rise to the recruitment of Drosophila phagocytes, called hemocytes, as well as the signals, such as TNFα, that stimulated hemocytes emit at sites of perceived damage. The signalling consequences of inflammation, such as the activation of JNK, and the potential for modifying this response are also discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell PolarityChromosomesCytokinesDrosophila melanogasterHemocytesImmunity, HumoralImmunity, InnateInflammationMAP Kinase Kinase 4NecrosisNeoplasmsPhagocytesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCytokinesMAP Kinase Kinase 4Reactive Oxygen SpeciesTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID25948885
PMCPMC4408615
OpenAlexW2077981497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.