Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948868›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2015

Specific electrophysiological components disentangle affective sharing and empathic concern in psychopathy.

Jean Decety, Kimberly L Lewis, Jason M Cowell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean DecetyChild Neurosuite, Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois decety@uchicago.edu.
Kimberly L LewisChild Neurosuite, Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.
Jason M CowellChild Neurosuite, Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and.

Funding

Neurological mechanisms in Emotional Processes of PsychopathyR01MH087525 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DECETY, JEAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.6M
Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience of Atypical Empathy in Conduct DisorderR01MH084934 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DECETY, JEAN · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH-084934NIMH NIH HHS R01-MH-087525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empathic impairment is one of the hallmarks of psychopathy, a personality dimension associated with poverty in affective reactions, lack of attachment to others, and a callous disregard for the feelings, rights, and welfare of others. Neuroscience research on the relation between empathy and psychopathy has predominately focused on the affective sharing and cognitive components of empathy in forensic populations, and much less on empathic concern. The current study used high-density electroencephalography in a community sample to examine the spatiotemporal neurodynamic responses when viewing people in physical distress under two subjective contexts: one evoking affective sharing, the other, empathic concern. Results indicate that early automatic (175-275 ms) and later controlled responses (LPP 400-1,000 ms) were differentially modulated by engagement in affective sharing or empathic concern. Importantly, the late event-related potentials (ERP) component was significantly impacted by dispositional empathy and psychopathy, but the early component was not. Individual differences in dispositional empathic concern directly predicted gamma coherence (25-40 Hz), whereas psychopathy was inversely modulatory. Interestingly, significant suppression in the mu/alpha band (8-13 Hz) when perceiving others in distress was positively associated with higher trait psychopathy, which argues against the assumption that sensorimotor resonance underpins empathy. Greater scores on trait psychopathy were inversely related to subjective ratings of both empathic concern and affective sharing. Overall, the study demonstrates that neural markers of affective sharing and empathic concern to the same cues of another's distress can be distinguished at an electrophysiological level, and that psychopathy alters later time-locked differentiations and spectral coherence associated with empathic concern.

Indexed as

Antisocial Personality DisorderBrainElectroencephalographyEmotionsEmpathyEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPain PerceptionPersonality TestsSocial PerceptionVisual PerceptionYoung Adultaffective sharingempathic concernempathyevent-related potentialsgamma coherencehigh-density EEGmu suppressionperception of distresspsychopathy

Identifiers

PMID25948868
PMCPMC4509400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.