ArticleJournal of virology2015
LMP1-Induced Sumoylation Influences the Maintenance of Epstein-Barr Virus Latency through KAP1.
Article in Journal of virology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- A System-Level Perspective on Epstein-Barr Virus Persistence: The Partial Lytic Reactivation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- CRISPR Screens Reveal Epstein-Barr Virus-activated JunB as a Key Lymphoblastoid B cell Dependency Factor that Represses Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor P18INK4c.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Epstein-Barr virus latent membrane protein 1 subverts IMPDH pathways to drive B-cell oncometabolism.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- Insights into the protein domains of C-VI TRIM subfamily in viral infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- KAP1 in antiviral immunity: dual roles in viral silencing and immune regulation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Multifaceted role ofMedComm · 2024Review
- Identifying the key regulators orchestrating Epstein-Barr virus reactivation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- The Immune Modulatory Role of TIF1 Proteins.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- TRIM28 in cancer and cancer therapy.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Review
- Adenovirus E1B-55K controls SUMO-dependent degradation of antiviral cellular restriction factors.Journal of virology · 2023Article
- Changes in SUMO-modified proteins in Epstein-Barr virus infection identifies reciprocal regulation of TRIM24/28/33 complexes and the lytic switch BZLF1.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- The role of tripartite motif-containing 28 in cancer progression and its therapeutic potentials.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Functional diversity: update of the posttranslational modification of Epstein-Barr virus coding proteins.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022Review
- NCommunications biology · 2022Article
- SUMOylation in Viral Replication and Antiviral Defense.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- Epstein-Barr Virus BGLF2 commandeers RISC to interfere with cellular miRNA function.PLoS pathogens · 2022Article
- KAP1/TRIM28: Transcriptional Activator and/or Repressor of Viral and Cellular Programs?Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Review
- SUMO: a novel target for anti-coronavirus therapy.Pathogens and global health · 2021Review
- Effects of targeting sumoylation processes during latent and induced Epstein-Barr virus infections using the small molecule inhibitor ML-792.Antiviral research · 2021Article
- A Tale of Usurpation and Subversion: SUMO-Dependent Integrity of Promyelocytic Leukemia Nuclear Bodies at the Crossroad of Infection and Immunity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
unlabelledAs a herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) establishes a latent infection that can periodically undergo reactivation, resulting in lytic replication and the production of new infectious virus. Latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1), the principal viral oncoprotein, is a latency-associated protein implicated in regulating viral reactivation and the maintenance of latency. We recently found that LMP1 hijacks the SUMO-conjugating enzyme Ubc9 via its C-terminal activating region-3 (CTAR3) and induces the sumoylation of cellular proteins. Because protein sumoylation can promote transcriptional repression, we hypothesized that LMP1-induced protein sumoylation induces the repression of EBV lytic promoters and helps maintain the viral genome in its latent state. We now show that with inhibition of LMP1-induced protein sumoylation, the latent state becomes less stable or leakier in EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines. The cells are also more sensitive to viral reactivation induced by irradiation, which results in the increased production and release of infectious virus, as well as increased susceptibility to ganciclovir treatment. We have identified a target of LMP1-mediated sumoylation that contributes to the maintenance of latency in this context: KRAB-associated protein-1 (KAP1). LMP1 CTAR3-mediated sumoylation regulates the function of KAP1. KAP1 also binds to EBV OriLyt and immediate early promoters in a CTAR3-dependent manner, and inhibition of sumoylation processes abrogates the binding of KAP1 to these promoters. These data provide an additional line of evidence that supports our findings that CTAR3 is a distinct functioning regulatory region of LMP1 and confirm that LMP1-induced sumoylation may help stabilize the maintenance of EBV latency. IMPORTANCE: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein-1 (LMP1) plays an important role in the maintenance of viral latency. Previously, we documented that LMP1 targets cellular proteins to be modified by a ubiquitin-like protein (SUMO). We have now identified a function for this LMP1-induced modification of cellular proteins in the maintenance of EBV latency. Because latently infected cells have to undergo viral reactivation in order to be vulnerable to antiviral drugs, these findings identify a new way to increase the rate of EBV reactivation, which increases cell susceptibility to antiviral therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.