Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948691›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

A conserved genetic mechanism specifies deutocerebral appendage identity in insects and arachnids.

Prashant P Sharma, Oscar A Tarazona, Davys H Lopez, Evelyn E Schwager, Martin J Cohn, Ward C Wheeler, Cassandra G Extavour

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cooption of an appendage-patterning gene cassette in the head segmentation of arachnids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Prashant P SharmaDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA psharma@amnh.org.
Oscar A TarazonaDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Davys H LopezDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Evelyn E SchwagerDepartment of Biological and Medical Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.
Martin J CohnDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.
Ward C WheelerDivision of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA.
Cassandra G ExtavourDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
University of Florida · USAmerican Museum of Natural History · USHarvard University · USOxford Brookes University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The segmental architecture of the arthropod head is one of the most controversial topics in the evolutionary developmental biology of arthropods. The deutocerebral (second) segment of the head is putatively homologous across Arthropoda, as inferred from the segmental distribution of the tripartite brain and the absence of Hox gene expression of this anterior-most, appendage-bearing segment. While this homology statement implies a putative common mechanism for differentiation of deutocerebral appendages across arthropods, experimental data for deutocerebral appendage fate specification are limited to winged insects. Mandibulates (hexapods, crustaceans and myriapods) bear a characteristic pair of antennae on the deutocerebral segment, whereas chelicerates (e.g. spiders, scorpions, harvestmen) bear the eponymous chelicerae. In such hexapods as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, and the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus, cephalic appendages are differentiated from the thoracic appendages (legs) by the activity of the appendage patterning gene homothorax (hth). Here we show that embryonic RNA interference against hth in the harvestman Phalangium opilio results in homeonotic chelicera-to-leg transformations, and also in some cases pedipalp-to-leg transformations. In more strongly affected embryos, adjacent appendages undergo fusion and/or truncation, and legs display proximal defects, suggesting conservation of additional functions of hth in patterning the antero-posterior and proximo-distal appendage axes. Expression signal of anterior Hox genes labial, proboscipedia and Deformed is diminished, but not absent, in hth RNAi embryos, consistent with results previously obtained with the insect G. bimaculatus. Our results substantiate a deep homology across arthropods of the mechanism whereby cephalic appendages are differentiated from locomotory appendages.

Indexed as

Body PatterningGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsArachnidaArthropod ProteinsExtremitiesHorseshoe CrabsInsectaMolecular Sequence DataRNA InterferenceScorpionsSequence Analysis, DNAArthropod ProteinsantennaArthropodacheliceradeutocerebrumopilionesserial homology

Identifiers

PMID25948691
PMCPMC4455815
OpenAlexW2204533759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.