ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015
Movements of genes between populations: are pollinators more effective at transferring their own or plant genetic markers?
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bumblebees mediate landscape effects on a forest herb's population genetic structure in European agricultural landscapes.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Enhanced and asymmetric signatures of hybridization at climatic margins: Evidence from closely related dioecious fig species.Plant diversity · 2024Article
- Genomic diversity and structure of a Neotropical microendemic fig tree.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Differentiating spillover: an examination of cross-habitat movement in ecology spillover in ecology.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Review
- The genetic structuring in pollinating wasps ofEcology and evolution · 2023Article
- Landscape Genetics of Plants: Challenges and Opportunities.Plant communications · 2020Review
- Loss of top-down biotic interactions changes the relative benefits for obligate mutualists.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Plant geographic phenotypic variation drives diversification in its associated community of a phytophagous insect and its parasitoids.BMC evolutionary biology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The transfer of genes between populations is increasingly important in a world where pollinators are declining, plant and animal populations are increasingly fragmented and climate change is forcing shifts in distribution. The distances that pollen can be transported by small insects are impressive, as is the extensive gene flow between their own populations. We compared the relative ease by which small insects introduce genetic markers into their own and host-plant populations. Gene flow via seeds and pollen between populations of an Asian fig species were evaluated using cpDNA and nuclear DNA markers, and between-population gene flow of its pollinator fig wasp was determined using microsatellites. This insect is the tree's only pollinator locally, and only reproduces in its figs. The plant's pollen-to-seed dispersal ratio was 9.183-9.437, smaller than that recorded for other Ficus. The relative effectiveness of the pollinator at introducing markers into its own populations was higher than the rate it introduced markers into the plant's populations (ratio = 14 : 1), but given the demographic differences between plant and pollinator, pollen transfer effectiveness is remarkably high. Resource availability affects the dispersal of fig wasps, and host-plant flowering phenology here and in other plant-pollinator systems may strongly influence relative gene flow rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.