Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948687›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2015

Epidemic predictions in an imperfect world: modelling disease spread with partial data.

Peter M Dawson, Marleen Werkman, Ellen Brooks-Pollock, Michael J Tildesley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Invited review: Big Data in precision dairy farming.Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Global Spread of Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses: Predicting Pandemics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter M DawsonCentre for Complexity Science, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK p.m.dawson@warwick.ac.uk.
Marleen WerkmanSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK Central Veterinary Institute, Wageningen UR (CVI), PO Box 65, 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Ellen Brooks-PollockSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.
Michael J TildesleySchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington LE12 5RD, UK Fogarty International Center, US National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K010972/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

'Big-data' epidemic models are being increasingly used to influence government policy to help with control and eradication of infectious diseases. In the case of livestock, detailed movement records have been used to parametrize realistic transmission models. While livestock movement data are readily available in the UK and other countries in the EU, in many countries around the world, such detailed data are not available. By using a comprehensive database of the UK cattle trade network, we implement various sampling strategies to determine the quantity of network data required to give accurate epidemiological predictions. It is found that by targeting nodes with the highest number of movements, accurate predictions on the size and spatial spread of epidemics can be made. This work has implications for countries such as the USA, where access to data is limited, and developing countries that may lack the resources to collect a full dataset on livestock movements.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesModels, TheoreticalAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesEpidemicsUnited KingdomUnited Statesepidemicslivestock networkspartial data

Identifiers

PMID25948687
PMCPMC4455802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.