Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948479›Full record

Trial reportBMC cardiovascular disorders2015

Telerehab III: a multi-center randomized, controlled trial investigating the long-term effectiveness of a comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation program--rationale and study design.

Ines Frederix, Dominique Hansen, Karin Coninx, Pieter Vandervoort, Emeline M Van Craenenbroeck, Christiaan Vrints, Paul Dendale

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. mHealth education interventions in heart failure.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ines FrederixDepartment of Cardiology, Jessa Hospital, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium. ines.frederix@gmail.com.
Dominique HansenDepartment of Cardiology, Jessa Hospital, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium. dominique.hansen@jessazh.be.
Karin ConinxFaculty of Sciences, Expertise Center for Digital Media, Hasselt University, Wetenschapspark 2, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium. karin.coninx@uhasselt.be.
Pieter VandervoortFaculty of Medicine & Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Agoralaan gebouw D, 3590, Diepenbeek, Belgium. pieter.vandervoort@zol.be.
Emeline M Van CraenenbroeckDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. emeline.vancraenenbroeck@uantwerpen.be.
Christiaan VrintsDepartment of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium. christiaan.vrints@uantwerpen.be.
Paul DendaleDepartment of Cardiology, Jessa Hospital, Stadsomvaart 11, 3500, Hasselt, Belgium. paul.dendale@jessazh.be.
Jessa Hospital · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BEHasselt University · BEZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelerehabilitation has been proposed as an adjunct/alternative to standard center-based cardiac rehabilitation. Two recent systematic reviews showed non-inferiority and/or superiority of this remote approach for cardiac rehabilitation. However, these trials focused only on one core component of cardiac rehabilitation and telemonitoring, rather than implementing a more comprehensive approach. The aim of Telerehab III is to investigate the long-term effectiveness of the addition of a patient-tailored, internet-based telerehabilitation program implementing multiple cardiac rehabilitation core components and using both telemonitoring and telecoaching strategies to standard cardiac rehabilitation. METHODS/

designIn this prospective, multi-center randomized, controlled trial 140 patients with coronary artery disease and/or chronic heart failure patients will be recruited between February 2013 and February 2015. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to an intervention group (receiving an internet-based telerehabilitation program in addition to standard cardiac rehabilitation) or to standard cardiac rehabilitation alone. The mean follow-up is at least 6 months. The primary endpoint is peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak). Secondary endpoints include measured and self-reported daily physical activity, cardiovascular risk factor control, health-related quality of life, days lost due to (non)cardiovascular rehospitalizations and time to first (non)cardiovascular rehospitalization. A clinical event committee blinded to treatment allocation assesses causes of rehospitalizations. DISCUSSION: Telerehab III will be one of the first studies to examine the added value of a more comprehensive cardiac telerehabilitation program, focusing on multiple cardiac rehabilitation core components. It has the potential to augment current standard center-based cardiac rehabilitation practices and to be used as a model for other disease prevention programs.

trial registrationCurrent controlled trials ISRCTN29243064. Registration date 21 January 2015.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery DiseaseDietExercise TherapyHeart FailureHumansInternetOxygen ConsumptionPhysical FitnessProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSmoking CessationTelerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID25948479
PMCPMC4432995
OpenAlexW1542867676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.