Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948399›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2015

The prevention, detection and management of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity: a meta-review.

Aaron Conway, Alexandra L McCarthy, Petra Lawrence, Robyn A Clark

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Understanding the distinct role of PI3K(p110Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. CardioAI: A Multimodal AI-based System to Support Symptom Monitoring and Risk Prediction of Cancer Treatment-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. A cross-sectional study on Chinese oncology nurses' knowledge of bone health among cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapy and targeted agents.American journal of cancer research · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron ConwaySchool of Nursing, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University Technology, Kelvin Grove Campus, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia. aaron.conway@qut.edu.au.
Alexandra L McCarthyDivision of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital and School of Nursing, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University Technology, Kelvin Grove Campus, Kelvin Grove, QLD, 4059, Australia. Al.mccarthy@qut.edu.au.
Petra LawrenceNursing Research & Practice Development Unit The Prince Charles Hospital and School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Petra.Lawrence@health.qld.gov.au.
Robyn A ClarkSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, 5042 GPO Box 2100, , Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, 5001, South Australia. robyn.clark@flinders.edu.au.
Flinders University · AUPrince Charles Hospital · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe benefits associated with some cancer treatments do not come without risk. A serious side effect of some common cancer treatments is cardiotoxicity. Increased recognition of the public health implications of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity has resulted in a proliferation of systematic reviews in this field to guide practice. Quality appraisal of these reviews is likely to limit the influence of biased conclusions from systematic reviews that have used poor methodology related to clinical decision-making. The aim of this meta-review is to appraise and synthesise evidence from only high quality systematic reviews focused on the prevention, detection or management of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity.

methodsUsing Cochrane methodology, we searched databases, citations and hand-searched bibliographies. Two reviewers independently appraised reviews and extracted findings. A total of 18 high quality systematic reviews were subsequently analysed, 67 % (n = 12) of these comprised meta-analyses.

resultsOne systematic review concluded that there is insufficient evidence regarding the utility of cardiac biomarkers for the detection of cardiotoxicity. The following strategies might reduce the risk of cardiotoxicity: 1) The concomitant administration of dexrazoxane with anthracylines; 2) The avoidance of anthracyclines where possible; 3) The continuous administration of anthracyclines (>6 h) rather than bolus dosing; and 4) The administration of anthracycline derivatives such as epirubicin or liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin instead of doxorubicin. In terms of management, one review focused on medical interventions for treating anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity during or after treatment of childhood cancer. Neither intervention (enalapril and phosphocreatine) was associated with statistically significant improvement in ejection fraction or mortality.

conclusionThis review highlights the lack of high level evidence to guide clinical decision-making with respect to the detection and management of cancer treatment-associated cardiotoxicity. There is more evidence with respect to the prevention of this adverse effect of cancer treatment. This evidence, however, only applies to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in a predominantly adult population. There is no high-level evidence to guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, detection or management of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, AntineoplasticCardiotoxicityDatabases, BibliographicDisease ManagementHumansNeoplasmsAnthracyclinesAntibiotics, Antineoplastic

Identifiers

PMID25948399
PMCPMC4427936
OpenAlexW1693670319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.