Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948272›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Modulating conscious movement intention by noninvasive brain stimulation and the underlying neural mechanisms.

Zachary H Douglas, Brian Maniscalco, Mark Hallett, Eric M Wassermann, Biyu J He

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. What is the intention to move and when does it occur?Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. FromFrontiers in psychology · 2019
    Article
  17. Lesion network localization of free will.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zachary H DouglasNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Brian ManiscalcoNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.
Mark HallettNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3180-6811
Eric M WassermannNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0628-0210
Biyu J HeNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 biyu.jade.he@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1549-1351

Funding

Physiology of Voluntary MovementZIANS002669 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI HALLETT, MARK · 2009 to 2023
$15.4M
Electrophysiological Probes And Treatments In Neurobehavioral DisordersZIANS002977 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI WASSERMANN, ERIC M · 2009 to 2025
$14.6M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conscious intention is a fundamental aspect of the human experience. Despite long-standing interest in the basis and implications of intention, its underlying neurobiological mechanisms remain poorly understood. Using high-definition transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS), we observed that enhancing spontaneous neuronal excitability in both the angular gyrus and the primary motor cortex caused the reported time of conscious movement intention to be ∼60-70 ms earlier. Slow brain waves recorded ∼2-3 s before movement onset, as well as hundreds of milliseconds after movement onset, independently correlated with the modulation of conscious intention by brain stimulation. These brain activities together accounted for 81% of interindividual variability in the modulation of movement intention by brain stimulation. A computational model using coupled leaky integrator units with biophysically plausible assumptions about the effect of tDCS captured the effects of stimulation on both neural activity and behavior. These results reveal a temporally extended brain process underlying conscious movement intention that spans seconds around movement commencement.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultConsciousnessElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMotor CortexMovementPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung AdultEEGmovement intentionslow cortical potentialspontaneous activitytDCSvolition

Identifiers

PMID25948272
PMCPMC4420786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.