Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25948250›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2015

Enhanced integration of motion information in children with autism.

Catherine Manning, Marc S Tibber, Tony Charman, Steven C Dakin, Elizabeth Pellicano

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Global Motion Perception in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Visual Responsivity in Autism: Measuring Visual Responses in Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults Using Psychophysics, fMRI, and EEG.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reduced social attention in autism is magnified by perceptual load in naturalistic environments.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Measuring the prediction of observed actions using an occlusion paradigm: Comparing autistic and non-autistic adults.Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine ManningCentre for Research in Autism and Education, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 0NU, United Kingdom, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3UD, United Kingdom, catherine.manning@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6862-2525
Marc S TibberInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London EC1V 9EL, United Kingdom.
Tony CharmanInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF.
Steven C DakinInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London EC1V 9EL, United Kingdom, Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand, and.
Elizabeth PellicanoCentre for Research in Autism and Education, UCL Institute of Education, University College London, London WC1H 0NU, United Kingdom, School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J013145/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To judge the overall direction of a shoal of fish or a crowd of people, observers must integrate motion signals across space and time. The limits on our ability to pool motion have largely been established using the motion coherence paradigm, in which observers report the direction of coherently moving dots amid randomly moving noise dots. Poor performance by autistic individuals on this task has widely been interpreted as evidence of disrupted integrative processes. Critically, however, motion coherence thresholds are not necessarily limited only by pooling. They could also be limited by imprecision in estimating the direction of individual elements or by difficulties segregating signal from noise. Here, 33 children with autism 6-13 years of age and 33 age- and ability-matched typical children performed a more robust task reporting mean dot direction both in the presence and the absence of directional variability alongside a standard motion coherence task. Children with autism were just as sensitive to directional differences as typical children when all elements moved in the same direction (no variability). However, remarkably, children with autism were more sensitive to the average direction in the presence of directional variability, providing the first evidence of enhanced motion integration in autism. Despite this improved averaging ability, children with autism performed comparably to typical children in the motion coherence task, suggesting that their motion coherence thresholds may be limited by reduced segregation of signal from noise. Although potentially advantageous under some conditions, increased integration may lead to feelings of "sensory overload" in children with autism.

Indexed as

AdolescentAutistic DisorderChildFemaleHumansMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPsychomotor Performanceautismdevelopmental disordersmotion perception

Identifiers

PMID25948250
PMCPMC4420775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.