ReviewInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2015
Gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics as a useful methodological framework for the Delphi technique.
Review in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Opioid conversion in adults with cancer: MASCC-ASCO-AAHPM-HPNA-NICSO guideline.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Guideline
- Existing guidance on reporting of consensus methodology: a systematic review to inform ACCORD guideline development.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- The participation of lifeworld experts in Delphi processes: A reflection on method and practice.MethodsX · 2025Review
- Gender and mental health of adolescents: A conceptual framework developed in a Delphi study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Towards an inclusive and culturally sensitive conceptualisation of sexual well-being of young people: preliminary framework development using a modified Delphi methodology.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2024Article
- Improving Delphi Process in Acupuncture Decision Making: Overall Descriptions and Quality Assessment of Delphi Reports.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Review
- Consensus on a social return on investment model of physical activity and sport: a Delphi study protocol.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Article
- Achieving Consensus Through a Modified Delphi Technique to Create the Post-concussion Collegiate Return-to-Learn Protocol.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol.Research integrity and peer review · 2022Article
- ILIVE Project Volunteer study. Developing international consensus for a European Core Curriculum for hospital end-of-life-care volunteer services, to train volunteers to support patients in the last weeks of life: A Delphi study.Palliative medicine · 2022Review
- " Being mutually involved in recovery". A hermeneutic exploration of nurses' experiences of patient participation in psychiatric care.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021Article
- From powerlessness to recognition the meaning of palliative care clinicians' experience of suffering.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2020Article
- Priorities for collaborative research using very preterm birth cohorts.Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2020Article
- Delphi Technique in Health Sciences: A Map.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- A transdiagnostic dimensional approach towards a neuropsychological assessment for addiction: an international Delphi consensus study.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2019Article
- Formative research in the development of a salutogenic early intervention home visiting program integrated in public child health service in a multiethnic population in Norway.BMC health services research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article we aim to demonstrate how Gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics may provide a sound methodological framework for researchers using the Delphi Technique (Delphi) in studies exploring health and well-being. Reporting of the use of Delphi in health and well-being research is increasing, but less attention has been given to covering its methodological underpinnings. In Delphi, a structured anonymous conversation between participants is facilitated, via an iterative survey process. Participants are specifically selected for their knowledge and experience with the topic of interest. The purpose of structuring conversation in this manner is to cultivate collective opinion and highlight areas of disagreement, using a process that minimizes the influence of group dynamics. The underlying premise is that the opinion of a collective is more useful than that of an individual. In designing our study into health literacy, Delphi aligned well with our research focus and would enable us to capture collective views. However, we were interested in the methodology that would inform our study. As researchers, we believe that methodology provides the framework and principles for a study and is integral to research integrity. In assessing the suitability of Delphi for our research purpose, we found little information about underpinning methodology. The absence of a universally recognized or consistent methodology associated with Delphi was highlighted through a scoping review we undertook to assist us in our methodological thinking. This led us to consider alternative methodologies, which might be congruent with the key principles of Delphi. We identified Gadamerian philosophical hermeneutics as a methodology that could provide a supportive framework and principles. We suggest that this methodology may be useful in health and well-being studies utilizing the Delphi method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.