ArticleIn vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal2015
Use of cell lines and primary cultures to explore the capacity of rainbow trout to be a host for frog virus 3 (FV3).
Article in In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Screening of Fish Cell Lines for Piscine Orthoreovirus-1 (PRV-1) Amplification: Identification of the Non-Supportive PRV-1 Invitrome.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Article
- Invitromatics, invitrome, and invitroomics: introduction of three new terms for in vitro biology and illustration of their use with the cell lines from rainbow trout.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The capacity of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, to be a host for frog virus 3 (FV3) was evaluated at the cellular level. Cell cultures from this species were tested for their ability to express FV3 major capsid protein (MCP) gene, to develop cytopathic effect (CPE), and to produce FV3. After FV3 addition, MCP transcripts were detected in six of six cell lines and in primary macrophage cultures. CPE developed in all cell culture systems, except primary lymphocytes. For the macrophage cell line, RTS11, and primary macrophages, cell death was by apoptosis because DNA laddering and Annexin staining were detected. By contrast, markers of apoptosis did not accompany CPE in three epithelial cell lines from the gill (RTgill-W1), intestine (RTgut-GC), and liver (RTL-W1) and in two fibroblast cell lines from gonads (RTG-2) and skin (RTHDF). Therefore, FV3 was able to enter and begin replicating in several cell types. Yet, FV3 was produced in only two cell lines, RTG-2 and RTL-W1, and only modestly. Overall, these results suggest that if tissue accessibility were possible, FV3 would have the capacity to induce injury, but the ability to replicate would be limited, likely making rainbow trout a poor host for FV3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.