Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25947541›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2015

Women's relative immunity to the socio-economic health gradient: artifact or real?

Susan P Phillips, Katarina Hamberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Current Situations and Challenges in the Development of Health Information Literacy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Metabolic Syndrome by Age and Gender in a Spanish Working Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Physical and psychosocial work factors as explanations for social inequalities in self-rated health.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susan P PhillipsDepartments of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Katarina HambergDivision of Family Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Queen's University · CAUmeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividual and area socio-economic status (SES) are significant predictors of morbidity and mortality in developed and developing countries. However, the span in health from poorest to richest, that is, the socio-economic gradient, appears steeper for men than women.

objectiveOur aim is to understand women's apparent immunity to the health harms of the SES gradient.

designFindings from a non-systematic search of Medline for population-based, SES gradient studies reporting results for both men and women and with health outcomes of morbidity, mortality or self-rated health (SRH) were reflectively analyzed.

resultsThe 36 papers reviewed generally showed women to be relatively immune to the SES gradient for all but cardiovascular health outcomes. However, addressing the interconnected nature of socio-economic circumstances, exploring whether some measures of SES had ambiguous meanings for either women or men, including modifiers of SES such as household circumstances, social capital or area gender equity, or using indicators of area SES that were contextual rather than aggregates of individual, compositional measures increased the SES gradient for women. Outcome measures that combined mental and physical health, accounted for gender differences in SRH and adjusted for sex-specific differences in causes of mortality also explained some of the observed amelioration of the SES gradient among women.

conclusionsSocio-economic circumstances have a real and sustained impact on individual health. The SES gradient appears stronger for men than for women for all health outcomes other than heart disease. However, some of the observed variability between men and women may be an artifact of biased methodology. Considering webs of causation rather than individual markers of SES along with other sources of gender bias can explain much of women's blunted socio-economic gradient and deepen understanding of the pathways from SES to morbidity and mortality overall.

Indexed as

Health Status DisparitiesWomen's HealthFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMental HealthSex FactorsSocial CapitalSocial Determinants of HealthSocioeconomic Factorscardiovascular diseasedeprivation indexgendermenmorbiditymortalitysex factorssocial capitalsocio-economic statuswomen

Identifiers

PMID25947541
PMCPMC4422842
OpenAlexW1505703413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.