Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25947296›Full record

ArticleFood & nutrition research2015

Relative validity and reliability of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for adults in Guam.

Rachael T Leon Guerrero, Marie Chong, Rachel Novotny, Lynne R Wilkens, Grazyna Badowski, Michelle Blas-Laguana, Suzanne Murphy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food & nutrition research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A meta-analysis of the reproducibility of food frequency questionnaires in nutritional epidemiological studies.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachael T Leon GuerreroCollege of Natural & Applied Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam; rachaeltlg@uguam.uog.edu.
Marie ChongCollege of Natural & Applied Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam.
Rachel NovotnyCollege of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Lynne R WilkensUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.
Grazyna BadowskiCollege of Natural & Applied Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam.
Michelle Blas-LaguanaCollege of Natural & Applied Sciences, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam.
Suzanne MurphyUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii.
University of Guam · GUUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

University of Hawaii Cancer Center CCSGP30CA071789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI Xin Chen · 1996 to 2026
$56.2M
University of Guam/Cancer Research Center of Hawaii Partnership (2 of 2)U54CA143728 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF GUAM · PI Laura Biggs · 2009 to 2026
$20.1M
University of Guam/Cancer Research Center of Hawaii Partnership (1 of 2)U54CA143727 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT MANOA · PI LYNNE R WILKENS · 2009 to 2026
$19.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA071789NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143727NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuam is a US territory in the western Pacific with a diverse population that includes understudied ethnic groups such as Chamorros and Filipinos. A food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to estimate dietary intake was needed to facilitate studies of diet and health among adults living in Guam.

objectiveTo develop and validate an FFQ to assess dietary intake over a 1-year period among adult Guam residents.

designA three-part study was conducted: 1) an initial cross-sectional study using 24-h recalls to identify a food and beverage list for the FFQ and resulting in a final FFQ containing 142 food and drink items; 2) to test reliability, 56 different individuals completed the FFQ twice; and 3) to test relative validity, self-administered FFQs and up to 2 days of food record data from an additional 109 individuals were collected, and daily nutrient intake from the two methods was compared.

resultsThe reliability of the FFQ was very good (ρ range=0.65-0.75), and the relative validity of the FFQ was good for women (median Spearman's correlation [ρ] between instruments of 0.45 across 20 nutrients and an interquartile range [IQR] of 0.42-0.58) and generally adequate for men (median ρ=0.31, IQR=0.23-0.55). Validity was also good for Chamorros (median ρ=0.47, IQR=0.38-0.53) and generally adequate for Filipinos (median ρ=0.42, IQR=0.20-0.62). Correlations after energy adjustment were lower (overall median ρ=0.20, IQR=0.14-0.26).

conclusionsThe FFQ can be used to rank nutrient intake for adults in Guam and may be helpful in the analysis of relationships between diet and chronic disease in Guam.

Indexed as

dietary assessmentfood frequency questionnaireGuamrelative validation

Identifiers

PMID25947296
PMCPMC4422845
OpenAlexW1527362286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.