Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25947147›Full record

ReviewClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2015

Cross-Reactivity, Epitope Spreading, and De Novo Immune Stimulation Are Possible Mechanisms of Cross-Protection of Nonvaccine Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Types in Recipients of HPV Therapeutic Vaccines.

Mayumi Nakagawa, William Greenfield, Andrea Moerman-Herzog, Hannah N Coleman

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP)-time for a reckoning?Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2017
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mayumi NakagawaDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA mnakagawa@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-4613
William GreenfieldDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Andrea Moerman-HerzogDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
Hannah N ColemanDepartment of Pathology, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · USUniversity of Arkansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Understanding and Enhancing T-Cell Responses to High Risk Human Papillomaviruses-RenewalR01CA143130 · NCI · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI NAKAGAWA, MAYUMI · 2010 to 2025
$10.0M
Arkansas Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000039 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BECK, CORNELIA MARIE, JAMES, LAURA P · 2012 to 2014
$10.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000039NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000039NCI NIH HHS R01 CA143130NCI NIH HHS R01CA143130
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous versions of human papillomavirus (HPV) therapeutic vaccines designed to treat individuals with established HPV infection, including those with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), are in development because approved prophylactic vaccines are not effective once HPV infection is established. As human papillomavirus 16 (HPV-16) is the most commonly detected type worldwide, all versions of HPV therapeutic vaccines contain HPV-16, and some also contain HPV-18. While these two HPV types are responsible for approximately 70% of cervical cancer cases, there are other high-risk HPV types known to cause malignancy. Therefore, it would be of interest to assess whether these HPV therapeutic vaccines may confer cross-protection against other high-risk HPV types. Data available from a few clinical trials that enrolled subjects with CINs regardless of the HPV type(s) present demonstrated clinical responses, as measured by CIN regression, in subjects with both vaccine-matched and nonvaccine HPV types. The currently available evidence demonstrating cross-reactivity, epitope spreading, and de novo immune stimulation as possible mechanisms of cross-protection conferred by investigational HPV therapeutic vaccines is discussed.

Indexed as

Cross ProtectionEpitopesHumansPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical DysplasiaEpitopesPapillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID25947147
PMCPMC4478515
OpenAlexW1783001925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.