ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Determining minimum set of driver nodes in protein-protein interaction networks.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Controllability Analysis of Intercellular Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- A practically efficient algorithm for identifying critical control proteins in directed probabilistic biological networks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- Measuring criticality in control of complex biological networks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Article
- WMDS.net: a network control framework for identifying key players in transcriptome programs.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Article
- Domination based classification algorithms for the controllability analysis of biological interaction networks.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Constraint-based models for dominating protein interaction networks.IET systems biology · 2021Article
- Probabilistic controllability approach to metabolic fluxes in normal and cancer tissues.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Network controllability analysis of intracellular signalling reveals viruses are actively controlling molecular systems.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Finding and analysing the minimum set of driver nodes required to control multilayer networks.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- The phenotype control kernel of a biomolecular regulatory network.BMC systems biology · 2018Article
- Critical controllability analysis of directed biological networks using efficient graph reduction.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Identification of genes and critical control proteins associated with inflammatory breast cancer using network controllability.PloS one · 2017Article
- Differential network analysis from cross-platform gene expression data.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Comparative analysis of housekeeping and tissue-specific driver nodes in human protein interaction networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Identification of key player genes in gene regulatory networks.BMC systems biology · 2016Article
- Critical controllability in proteome-wide protein interaction network integrating transcriptome.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Analysis of the Effect of Degree Correlation on the Size of Minimum Dominating Sets in Complex Networks.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, several studies have drawn attention to the determination of a minimum set of driver proteins that are important for the control of the underlying protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. In general, the minimum dominating set (MDS) model is widely adopted. However, because the MDS model does not generate a unique MDS configuration, multiple different MDSs would be generated when using different optimization algorithms. Therefore, among these MDSs, it is difficult to find out the one that represents the true driver set of proteins.
resultsTo address this problem, we develop a centrality-corrected minimum dominating set (CC-MDS) model which includes heterogeneity in degree and betweenness centralities of proteins. Both the MDS model and the CC-MDS model are applied on three human PPI networks. Unlike the MDS model, the CC-MDS model generates almost the same sets of driver proteins when we implement it using different optimization algorithms. The CC-MDS model targets more high-degree and high-betweenness proteins than the uncorrected counterpart. The more central position allows CC-MDS proteins to be more important in maintaining the overall network connectivity than MDS proteins. To indicate the functional significance, we find that CC-MDS proteins are involved in, on average, more protein complexes and GO annotations than MDS proteins. We also find that more essential genes, aging genes, disease-associated genes and virus-targeted genes appear in CC-MDS proteins than in MDS proteins. As for the involvement in regulatory functions, the sets of CC-MDS proteins show much stronger enrichment of transcription factors and protein kinases. The results about topological and functional significance demonstrate that the CC-MDS model can capture more driver proteins than the MDS model.
conclusionsBased on the results obtained, the CC-MDS model presents to be a powerful tool for the determination of driver proteins that can control the underlying PPI networks. The software described in this paper and the datasets used are available at https://github.com/Zhangxf-ccnu/CC-MDS .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.