Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25947063›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Determining minimum set of driver nodes in protein-protein interaction networks.

Xiao-Fei Zhang, Le Ou-Yang, Yuan Zhu, Meng-Yun Wu, Dao-Qing Dai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Controllability Analysis of Intercellular Protein-Protein Interaction Networks.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Measuring criticality in control of complex biological networks.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiao-Fei ZhangSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Central China Normal University, Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, China. zhangxf@mail.ccnu.edu.cn.
Le Ou-YangIntelligent Data Center and Department of Mathematics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Xingang West Road, Guangzhou, 510275, China. ouyangle@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
Yuan ZhuSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, ChiSha Road, Guangzhou, 510320, China. zhuyuan7@mail2.sysu.edu.cn.
Meng-Yun WuSchool of Statistics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Guoding Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. wu.mengyun@mail.shufe.edu.cn.
Dao-Qing DaiIntelligent Data Center and Department of Mathematics, Sun Yat-Sen University, Xingang West Road, Guangzhou, 510275, China. stsddq@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNCentral China Normal University · CNGuangdong University Of Finances and Economics · CNShanghai University of Finance and Economics · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, several studies have drawn attention to the determination of a minimum set of driver proteins that are important for the control of the underlying protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks. In general, the minimum dominating set (MDS) model is widely adopted. However, because the MDS model does not generate a unique MDS configuration, multiple different MDSs would be generated when using different optimization algorithms. Therefore, among these MDSs, it is difficult to find out the one that represents the true driver set of proteins.

resultsTo address this problem, we develop a centrality-corrected minimum dominating set (CC-MDS) model which includes heterogeneity in degree and betweenness centralities of proteins. Both the MDS model and the CC-MDS model are applied on three human PPI networks. Unlike the MDS model, the CC-MDS model generates almost the same sets of driver proteins when we implement it using different optimization algorithms. The CC-MDS model targets more high-degree and high-betweenness proteins than the uncorrected counterpart. The more central position allows CC-MDS proteins to be more important in maintaining the overall network connectivity than MDS proteins. To indicate the functional significance, we find that CC-MDS proteins are involved in, on average, more protein complexes and GO annotations than MDS proteins. We also find that more essential genes, aging genes, disease-associated genes and virus-targeted genes appear in CC-MDS proteins than in MDS proteins. As for the involvement in regulatory functions, the sets of CC-MDS proteins show much stronger enrichment of transcription factors and protein kinases. The results about topological and functional significance demonstrate that the CC-MDS model can capture more driver proteins than the MDS model.

conclusionsBased on the results obtained, the CC-MDS model presents to be a powerful tool for the determination of driver proteins that can control the underlying PPI networks. The software described in this paper and the datasets used are available at https://github.com/Zhangxf-ccnu/CC-MDS .

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene Regulatory NetworksModels, TheoreticalProtein Interaction MapsSoftwareHumansProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID25947063
PMCPMC4428234
OpenAlexW2118089467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.