ArticleGlobal journal of health science2015
A conceptual framework for evaluation of public health and primary care system performance in iran.
Article in Global journal of health science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indicators, frameworks, and influencing factors for evaluating the performance of mental health programs in primary health care: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Public health system response to emerging infectious respiratory outbreaks in Iran.Global health action · 2025Article
- Dimensions of Health System Performance Assessment: A Scoping Review.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Review
- Key Indicators for Monitoring the Efficiency of Iranian Health System: A Synthesized Design Study.Iranian journal of public health · 2024Article
- Adapting the Donabedian model in undergraduate nursing education: a modified Delphi study.BMC medical education · 2024Article
- Qualitative Analysis of Newborn Hearing Screening Program in Iran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2024Article
- Developing Iranian sub-national Primary Health Care Measurement Framework: a study protocol.Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
- Assessing urban resilience to public health disaster using the rough analytic hierarchy process method: A regional study in China.Journal of safety science and resilience = An quan ke xue yu ren xing (Ying wen) · 2022Article
- Ranking Universities of Medical Sciences as Public Health Services Provider Institutions in Iran: A Result-Chain Analysis.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2022Article
- Preferences for healthcare services among hypertension patients in China: a discrete choice experiment.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Performance evaluation and ranking of regional primary health care and public health Systems in Iran.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Frameworks of Performance Measurement in Public Health and Primary Care System: A Scoping Review and Meta-Synthesis.International journal of preventive medicine · 2020Article
- Advancing research on emergency care systems in low-income and middle-income countries: ensuring high-quality care delivery systems.BMJ global health · 2019Review
- Modeling patient access to therapeutic oxytocin in Zanzibar, Tanzania.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- [Construction of a monitoring framework for universal healthConstrução de um quadro de monitoramento para saúde universal].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2018Article
- Factors influencing decision making for healthcare services outsourcing: A review and Delphi study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe main objective of this study was to design a conceptual framework, according to the policies and priorities of the ministry of health to evaluate provincial public health and primary care performance and to assess their share in the overall health impacts of the community.
methodsWe used several tools and techniques, including system thinking, literature review to identify relevant attributes of health system performance framework and interview with the key stakeholders. The PubMed, Scopus, web of science, Google Scholar and two specialized databases of Persian language literature (IranMedex and SID) were searched using main terms and keywords. Following decision-making and collective agreement among the different stakeholders, 51 core indicators were chosen from among 602 obtained indicators in a four stage process, for monitoring and evaluation of Health Deputies.
resultsWe proposed a conceptual framework by identifying the performance area for Health Deputies between other determinants of health, as well as introducing a chain of results, for performance, consisting of Input, Process, Output and Outcome indicators. We also proposed 5 dimensions for measuring the performance of Health Deputies, consisting of efficiency, effectiveness, equity, access and improvement of health status.
conclusionThe proposed Conceptual Framework illustrates clearly the Health Deputies success in achieving best results and consequences of health in the country. Having the relative commitment of the ministry of health and Health Deputies at the University of Medical Sciences is essential for full implementation of this framework and providing the annual performance report.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.