Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25946708›Full record

Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2015

Comparison of in-patient costs for children treated on the AAML0531 clinical trial: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

Kelly D Getz, Yimei Li, Todd A Alonzo, Matthew Hall, Robert B Gerbing, Lillian Sung, Yuan-Shung Huang, Staci Arnold, Alix E Seif, Tamara P Miller and 6 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bending the Cost Curve in Childhood Cancer.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Kelly D GetzThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Yimei LiThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Todd A AlonzoUniversity of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Matthew HallChildren's Hospital Association, Overland Park, Kansas.
Robert B GerbingChildren's Oncology Group, Monrovia, California.
Lillian SungHospital for Sick Children, Toronto.
Yuan-Shung HuangThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Staci ArnoldColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Alix E SeifThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tamara P MillerThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Rochelle BagatellThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Brian T FisherThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Peter C AdamsonThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Alan GamisChildren's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri.
Ron KerenThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Richard AplencThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Hospital Association · USChildren's Mercy Hospital · USChildren's Oncology Group · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

NCTN BIQSFP ANBL1531 (NRT)U10CA180886 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI Douglas S. Hawkins · 2014 to 2026
$390.6M
COG FOREIGN ACCRUALU10CA098543 · NCI · NATIONAL CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION · PI ADAMSON, PETER C. · 2003 to 2013
$335.5M
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Robert H. Vonderheide · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
COG SDMC - Statistics CoreU10CA180899 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TODD A ALONZO · 2014 to 2026
$132.8M
Children's Oncology Group Statistics &Data Center GrantU10CA098413 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDERSON, JAMES R · 2003 to 2013
$67.5M
Towards a preventive cancer vaccine for children with constitutional mismatch repair deficiencyUG1CA189955 · NCI · PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI BRAD H POLLOCK, Michael E. Roth · 2014 to 2026
$62.5M
Physician Scientist Training in Clinical OncologyK12CA076931 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI STEPHEN Patrick HUNGER, LYNN M. SCHUCHTER · 1997 to 2026
$16.5M
Toxicity Monitoring on Phase III Trials with Administrative DataR01CA165277 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI APLENC, RICHARD · 2012 to 2015
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA076931NCI NIH HHS NIH R01CA165277NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA165277NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098413NCI NIH HHS U10 CA098543NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180886NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180899NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA better understanding of drivers of treatment costs may help identify effective cost containment strategies and prioritize resources. We aimed to develop a method for estimating inpatient costs for pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) enrolled on NCI-funded Phase III trials, compare costs between AAML0531 treatment arms (standard chemotherapy ± gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GMTZ)), and evaluate primary drivers of costs for newly diagnosed pediatric AML. PROCEDURE: Patients from the AAML0531 trial were matched on hospital, sex, and dates of birth and diagnosis to the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database to obtain daily billing data. Inpatient treatment costs were calculated as adjusted charges multiplied by hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios. Generalized linear models were used to compare costs between treatment arms and courses, and by patient characteristics.

resultsInpatient costs did not differ by randomized treatment arm. Costs varied by course with stem cell transplant being most expensive, followed by Intensification II (cytarabine/mitoxantrone) and Induction I (cytarabine/daunorubicin/etoposide). Room/board and pharmacy were the largest contributors to inpatient treatment cost, representing 74% of the total cost. Higher AML risk group (P = 0.0003) and older age (P < 0.0001) were associated with significantly higher daily inpatient cost.

conclusionsCosts from external data sources can be successfully integrated into NCI-funded Phase III clinical trials. Inpatient treatment costs did not differ by GMTZ exposure but varied by chemotherapy course. Variation in cost by course was driven by differences in duration of hospitalization through room/board charges as well as increased clinical and pharmacy charges in specific courses.

Indexed as

AdolescentAminoglycosidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGemtuzumabHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInpatientsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleStem Cell TransplantationAminoglycosidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic AgentsGemtuzumabacute myeloid leukemiacost and cost analysispediatrictreatment cost

Identifiers

PMID25946708
PMCPMC4546551
OpenAlexW1910030854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.