ArticlePLoS biology2015
The renaissance of developmental biology.
Article in PLoS biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Species Choice and Model Use: Reviving Research on Human Development.Journal of the history of biology · 2024Article
- Pluripotency of a founding field: rebranding developmental biology.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Seriously cilia: A tiny organelle illuminates evolution, disease, and intercellular communication.Developmental cell · 2023Review
- Reflections on the past, present and future of developmental biology.Developmental biology · 2022Article
- Seven challenges in the multiscale modeling of multicellular tissues.WIREs mechanisms of disease · 2022Review
- Multimodal high-resolution embryonic imaging with light sheet fluorescence microscopy and optical coherence tomography.Optics letters · 2021Article
- Aristotle, Buddhist scripture and embryology in ancient Mexico: building inclusion by re-thinking what counts as the history of developmental biology.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Review
- Contemporary morphogenesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Nonadhesive Alginate Hydrogels Support Growth of Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Intestinal Organoids.Stem cell reports · 2019Article
- Graph analysis of cell clusters forming vascular networks.Royal Society open science · 2018Article
- Hacking the Matrix.Cell stem cell · 2017Article
- From Reductionism to Holism: Toward a More Complete View of Development Through Genome Engineering.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2017Review
- hPSC-derived lung and intestinal organoids as models of human fetal tissue.Developmental biology · 2016Review
- Article
- The Early Stages of Heart Development: Insights from Chicken Embryos.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2016Review
- Developmental biology teaching - the importance of a practical approach.F1000Research · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Since its heyday in the 1980s and 90s, the field of developmental biology has gone into decline; in part because it has been eclipsed by the rise of genomics and stem cell biology, and in part because it has seemed less pertinent in an era with so much focus on translational impact. In this essay, I argue that recent progress in genome-wide analyses and stem cell research, coupled with technological advances in imaging and genome editing, have created the conditions for the renaissance of a new wave of developmental biology with greater translational relevance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.