Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25946134›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Rational design of antibiotic treatment plans: a treatment strategy for managing evolution and reversing resistance.

Portia M Mira, Kristina Crona, Devin Greene, Juan C Meza, Bernd Sturmfels, Miriam Barlow

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Elucidation of the growth phenotypes of 82 strains from theFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Reinforcement learning informs optimal treatment strategies to limit antibiotic resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Exploiting evolutionary trade-offs for posttreatment management of drug-resistant populations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Adaptive Landscapes in the Age of Synthetic Biology.Molecular biology and evolution · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Portia M MiraSchool of Natural Science, University of California Merced, Merced, California, United States of America.
Kristina CronaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, American University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Devin GreeneDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, American University, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Juan C MezaSchool of Natural Science, University of California Merced, Merced, California, United States of America.
Bernd SturmfelsDepartments of Mathematics, Statistics, and EECS, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Miriam BarlowSchool of Natural Science, University of California Merced, Merced, California, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of reliable methods for restoring susceptibility after antibiotic resistance arises has proven elusive. A greater understanding of the relationship between antibiotic administration and the evolution of resistance is key to overcoming this challenge. Here we present a data-driven mathematical approach for developing antibiotic treatment plans that can reverse the evolution of antibiotic resistance determinants. We have generated adaptive landscapes for 16 genotypes of the TEM β-lactamase that vary from the wild type genotype "TEM-1" through all combinations of four amino acid substitutions. We determined the growth rate of each genotype when treated with each of 15 β-lactam antibiotics. By using growth rates as a measure of fitness, we computed the probability of each amino acid substitution in each β-lactam treatment using two different models named the Correlated Probability Model (CPM) and the Equal Probability Model (EPM). We then performed an exhaustive search through the 15 treatments for substitution paths leading from each of the 16 genotypes back to the wild type TEM-1. We identified optimized treatment paths that returned the highest probabilities of selecting for reversions of amino acid substitutions and returning TEM to the wild type state. For the CPM model, the optimized probabilities ranged between 0.6 and 1.0. For the EPM model, the optimized probabilities ranged between 0.38 and 1.0. For cyclical CPM treatment plans in which the starting and ending genotype was the wild type, the probabilities were between 0.62 and 0.7. Overall this study shows that there is promise for reversing the evolution of resistance through antibiotic treatment plans.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialModels, GeneticAmino Acid SubstitutionAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesDrug Administration ScheduleEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularGenotypeProbabilityAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-Lactamases

Identifiers

PMID25946134
PMCPMC4422678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.