Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25946126›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Oral Microbiota Shift after 12-Week Supplementation with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289; A Randomized Control Trial.

Nelly Romani Vestman, Tsute Chen, Pernilla Lif Holgerson, Carina Öhman, Ingegerd Johansson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02311218 (Oral Microbiota Shift After 12-week Supplementation With Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02311218 phase2completednot on this map

Oral Microbiota Shift After 12-week Supplementation With Lactobacillus Reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289

TypeinterventionalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2013 to 2013Enrolled44ConditionsDental PlaqueArmsLactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oral hygiene agents at work: effects onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The Gut Microbiota Affects Anti-TNF Responsiveness by Activating the NADAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Anti-Inflammatory Efficacy of Human-DerivedJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  17. Influence of the ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nelly Romani VestmanDepartment of Odontology/section of Cariology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Tsute ChenDepartment of Microbiology, The Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, United States of America.
Pernilla Lif HolgersonDepartment of Odontology/section of Pedodontics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Carina ÖhmanDepartment of Odontology/section of Cariology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ingegerd JohanssonDepartment of Odontology/section of Cariology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University · SE

Funding

Mouse Oral Microbiome DatabaseR37DE016937 · NIDCR · ADA FORSYTH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI DEWHIRST, FLOYD E · 2011 to 2020
$8.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS R37 DE016937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactobacillus spp. potentially contribute to health by modulating bacterial biofilm formation, but their effects on the overall oral microbiota remain unclear. METHODS AND

findingsOral microbiota was characterized via 454-pyrosequencing of the 16S rDNA hypervariable region V3-V4 after 12 weeks of daily Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 and PTA 5289 consumption. Forty-four adults were assigned to a test group (n = 22) that received lactobacilli lozenges (108 CFU of each strain/lozenge) or a control group that received placebo (n = 22). Presence of L. reuteri was confirmed by cultivation and species specific PCR. Tooth biofilm samples from 16 adults before, during, and after exposure were analyzed by pyrosequencing. A total of 1,310,292 sequences were quality filtered. After removing single reads, 257 species or phylotypes were identified at 98.5% identity in the Human Oral Microbiome Database. Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the most abundant phyla. Streptococcus was the most common genus and the S. oralis/S. mitis/S. mitis bv2/S. infantis group comprised the dominant species. The number of observed species was unaffected by L. reuteri exposure. However, subjects who had consumed L. reuteri were clustered in a principal coordinates analysis relative to scattering at baseline, and multivariate modeling of pyrosequencing microbiota, and culture and PCR detected L. reuteri separated baseline from 12-week samples in test subjects. L. reuteri intake correlated with increased S. oralis/S. mitis/S. mitis bv2/S. infantis group and Campylobacter concisus, Granulicatella adiacens, Bergeyella sp. HOT322, Neisseria subflava, and SR1 [G-1] sp. HOT874 detection and reduced S. mutans, S. anginosus, N. mucosa, Fusobacterium periodicum, F. nucleatum ss vincentii, and Prevotella maculosa detection. This effect had disappeared 1 month after exposure was terminated.

conclusionsL. reuteri consumption did not affect species richness but induced a shift in the oral microbiota composition. The biological relevance of this remains to be elucidated.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02311218.

Indexed as

AdultBiofilmsDietary SupplementsDNA, BacterialDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLimosilactobacillus reuteriMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedMouthProbioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSalivaYoung AdultDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25946126
PMCPMC4422650
OpenAlexW1831961036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.