ArticlePloS one2015
Preterm or not--an evaluation of estimates of gestational age in a cohort of women from Rural Papua New Guinea.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of different methods for calculating gestational age at birth on prematurity and small for gestational age proportions: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine plus azithromycin may improve birth outcomes through impacts on inflammation and placental angiogenesis independent of malarial infection.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Congenital abnormalities in Pacific Island Countries and Territories: a scoping review.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Vulnerable newborn types: analysis of subnational, population-based birth cohorts for 541 285 live births in 23 countries, 2000-2021.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025Article
- A simplified amoxicillin regimen with dose frequency based on post-natal age in neonates with confirmed or suspected infection.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025Observational
- Impact on pregnancy outcomes of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in urban and peri-urban Papua New Guinea: a retrospective cohort study.Malaria journal · 2024Article
- Problems with gestational age estimation by last menstrual period and ultrasound among late antenatal care attendant women in a low-resource setting in Africa, Sudan.Journal of ultrasound · 2024Article
- Prevalence and causes of ocular disorders and visual impairment among preterm children in Ethiopia.BMJ paediatrics open · 2024Article
- Correcting for measurement error in assessing gestational age in a low-resource setting: a regression calibration approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Gestational age assessed by optical skin reflection in low-birth-weight newborns: Applications in classification at birth.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Newborn Skin Maturity Medical Device Validation for Gestational Age Prediction: Clinical Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Prediction of gestational age using urinary metabolites in term and preterm pregnancies.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Targeted newborn metabolomics: prediction of gestational age from cord blood.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022Article
- Association between the chronology of gestation and the morphometrical skin characteristics at childbirth: a development of predictive model.BMJ health & care informatics · 2021Article
- The relationship between markers of antenatal iron stores and birth outcomes differs by malaria prevention regimen-a prospective cohort study.BMC medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Quality of Pregnancy Dating and Obstetric Interventions During Labor: Retrospective Database Analysis.JMIR pediatrics and parenting · 2020Article
- A Proxy for Detecting IUGR Based on Gestational Age Estimation in a Guatemalan Rural Population.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2020Article
- Agreement between antenatal gestational age by ultrasound and clinical records at birth: A prospective cohort in the Brazilian Amazon.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnowledge of accurate gestational age is required for comprehensive pregnancy care and is an essential component of research evaluating causes of preterm birth. In industrialised countries gestational age is determined with the help of fetal biometry in early pregnancy. Lack of ultrasound and late presentation to antenatal clinic limits this practice in low-resource settings. Instead, clinical estimators of gestational age are used, but their accuracy remains a matter of debate.
methodsIn a cohort of 688 singleton pregnancies from rural Papua New Guinea, delivery gestational age was calculated from Ballard score, last menstrual period, symphysis-pubis fundal height at first visit and quickening as well as mid- and late pregnancy fetal biometry. Published models using sequential fundal height measurements and corrected last menstrual period to estimate gestational age were also tested. Novel linear models that combined clinical measurements for gestational age estimation were developed. Predictions were compared with the reference early pregnancy ultrasound (<25 gestational weeks) using correlation, regression and Bland-Altman analyses and ranked for their capability to predict preterm birth using the harmonic mean of recall and precision (F-measure).
resultsAverage bias between reference ultrasound and clinical methods ranged from 0-11 days (95% confidence levels: 14-42 days). Preterm birth was best predicted by mid-pregnancy ultrasound (F-measure: 0.72), and neuromuscular Ballard score provided the least reliable preterm birth prediction (F-measure: 0.17). The best clinical methods to predict gestational age and preterm birth were last menstrual period and fundal height (F-measures 0.35). A linear model combining both measures improved prediction of preterm birth (F-measure: 0.58).
conclusionsEstimation of gestational age without ultrasound is prone to significant error. In the absence of ultrasound facilities, last menstrual period and fundal height are among the more reliable clinical measures. This study underlines the importance of strengthening ultrasound facilities and developing novel ways to estimate gestational age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.