Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25945916›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Computations underlying Drosophila photo-taxis, odor-taxis, and multi-sensory integration.

Ruben Gepner, Mirna Mihovilovic Skanata, Natalie M Bernat, Margarita Kaplow, Marc Gershow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CRASH2p: Closed-loop Two Photon Imaging in a Freely Moving Animal.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Olfactory navigation in arthropods.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. An internal expectation guidesScience advances · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruben GepnerDepartment of Physics, New York University, New York, United States.
Mirna Mihovilovic SkanataDepartment of Physics, New York University, New York, United States.
Natalie M BernatDepartment of Physics, New York University, New York, United States.
Margarita KaplowCenter for Neural Science, New York University, New York, United States.
Marc GershowDepartment of Physics, New York University, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand how organisms make decisions on the basis of temporally varying multi-sensory input, we identified computations made by Drosophila larvae responding to visual and optogenetically induced fictive olfactory stimuli. We modeled the larva's navigational decision to initiate turns as the output of a Linear-Nonlinear-Poisson cascade. We used reverse-correlation to fit parameters to this model; the parameterized model predicted larvae's responses to novel stimulus patterns. For multi-modal inputs, we found that larvae linearly combine olfactory and visual signals upstream of the decision to turn. We verified this prediction by measuring larvae's responses to coordinated changes in odor and light. We studied other navigational decisions and found that larvae integrated odor and light according to the same rule in all cases. These results suggest that photo-taxis and odor-taxis are mediated by a shared computational pathway.

Indexed as

LightModels, BiologicalOdorantsAnimalsChemotaxisDrosophilaMotor ActivityOptogeneticsPhotic StimulationSpatial NavigationStimulation, ChemicalD. melanogastermulti-sensory integrationneuroscienceolfactionoptogeneticsreverse-correlationvision

Identifiers

PMID25945916
PMCPMC4466338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.