Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25945740›Full record

ArticleNature2015

Evolution: Steps on the road to eukaryotes.

T Martin Embley, Tom A Williams

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Physiology of Phagocytosis in the Context of Mitochondrial Origin.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2017
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Viruses and mobile elements as drivers of evolutionary transitions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Energetics and population genetics at the root of eukaryotic cellular and genomic complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. Open Questions on the Origin of Eukaryotes.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Origin of eukaryotes from within archaea, archaeal eukaryome and bursts of gene gain: eukaryogenesis just made easier?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Review
  17. Changing ideas about eukaryotic origins.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T Martin EmbleyInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.
Tom A WilliamsInstitute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularPhylogenyArchaeaEukaryotaHydrothermal VentsProkaryotic Cells

Identifiers

PMID25945740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.