Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25945652›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2015

Modulation of insulin degrading enzyme activity and liver cell proliferation.

Olga Pivovarova, Christian von Loeffelholz, Iryna Ilkavets, Carsten Sticht, Sergei Zhuk, Veronica Murahovschi, Sonja Lukowski, Stephanie Döcke, Jennifer Kriebel, Tonia de las Heras Gala and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Targeting Insulin-Degrading Enzyme in Insulin Clearance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Olga Pivovarovaa Department of Clinical Nutrition ; German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke ; Nuthetal , Germany.
Christian von Loeffelholz
Iryna Ilkavets
Carsten Sticht
Sergei Zhuk
Veronica Murahovschi
Sonja Lukowski
Stephanie Döcke
Jennifer Kriebel
Tonia de las Heras Gala
Anna Malashicheva
Anna Kostareva
Johan F Lock
Martin Stockmann
Harald Grallert
Norbert Gretz
Steven Dooley
Andreas F H Pfeiffer
Natalia Rudovich
Heidelberg University · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEInstituto de Biomedicina y Genética Molecular de Valladolid · ESInstitute of Molecular Biotechnology · ATScientific Imaging and Visualization (United States) · USUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM), insulin therapy, and hyperinsulinemia are independent risk factors of liver cancer. Recently, the use of a novel inhibitor of insulin degrading enzyme (IDE) was proposed as a new therapeutic strategy in T2DM. However, IDE inhibition might stimulate liver cell proliferation via increased intracellular insulin concentration. The aim of this study was to characterize effects of inhibition of IDE activity in HepG2 hepatoma cells and to analyze liver specific expression of IDE in subjects with T2DM. HepG2 cells were treated with 10 nM insulin for 24 h with or without inhibition of IDE activity using IDE RNAi, and cell transcriptome and proliferation rate were analyzed. Human liver samples (n = 22) were used for the gene expression profiling by microarrays. In HepG2 cells, IDE knockdown changed expression of genes involved in cell cycle and apoptosis pathways. Proliferation rate was lower in IDE knockdown cells than in controls. Microarray analysis revealed the decrease of hepatic IDE expression in subjects with T2DM accompanied by the downregulation of the p53-dependent genes FAS and CCNG2, but not by the upregulation of proliferation markers MKI67, MCM2 and PCNA. Similar results were found in the liver microarray dataset from GEO Profiles database. In conclusion, IDE expression is decreased in liver of subjects with T2DM which is accompanied by the dysregulation of p53 pathway. Prolonged use of IDE inhibitors for T2DM treatment should be carefully tested in animal studies regarding its potential effect on hepatic tumorigenesis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedApoptosisCell ProliferationCohort StudiesCyclin G2Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2fas ReceptorFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHep G2 CellsHumansInsulinInsulysinKi-67 AntigenLiverCCNG2 protein, humanCyclin G2FAS protein, humanfas ReceptorInsulinInsulysinKi-67 AntigenMCM2 protein, humanMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Proliferating Cell Nuclear AntigenCCNG2, Cyclin G2 gene, CDKN1A/P21, Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1A (p21, Cip1) geneCDKN1B/P27, Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B (p27, Kip1) geneFAS, Fas cell surface death receptor geneFBS, Fetal bovine serumhepatocellular carcinomaIDE, Insulin-degrading enzymeinsulin-degrading enzymeMCM2, Minichromosome maintenance complex component 2 geneMKI67, Marker of proliferation Ki-67 geneNAFLD, Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseNAS, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease scorenon-alcoholic fatty liver diseaseOGTT, Oral glucose tolerance testPCNA, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen geneproliferationqRT-PCR, Quantitative real-time PCRSESN1, Sestrin 1 geneT2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus.TP53I3, Tumor protein p53 inducible protein 3 geneTP53, Tumor protein p53 genetype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID25945652
PMCPMC4613656
OpenAlexW1488118434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.