Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25945493›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Long-Term Safety of Repeated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening via Focused Ultrasound with Microbubbles in Non-Human Primates Performing a Cognitive Task.

Matthew E Downs, Amanda Buch, Carlos Sierra, Maria Eleni Karakatsani, Tobias Teichert, Shangshang Chen, Elisa E Konofagou, Vincent P Ferrera

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 106 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 219 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Neurological glycogen storage diseases and emerging therapeutics.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Remotely controlled drug release in deep brain regions of non-human primates.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Matthew E DownsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Amanda BuchDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Carlos SierraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Maria Eleni KarakatsaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Tobias Teichert
Shangshang ChenDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Elisa E KonofagouDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America; Department of Radiology, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Vincent P FerreraDepartment of Neuroscience, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Assessment of Ultrsound-facilitated Neurotherapeutics in Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG038961 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2011 to 2020
$5.1M
Optimization of ultrasound-facilitated blood-brain barrier openingR01EB009041 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2008 to 2017
$4.4M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG038961NIA NIH HHS R01AG038961NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009041NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB009041
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused Ultrasound (FUS) coupled with intravenous administration of microbubbles (MB) is a non-invasive technique that has been shown to reliably open (increase the permeability of) the blood-brain barrier (BBB) in multiple in vivo models including non-human primates (NHP). This procedure has shown promise for clinical and basic science applications, yet the safety and potential neurological effects of long term application in NHP requires further investigation under parameters shown to be efficacious in that species (500 kHz, 200-400 kPa, 4-5 μm MB, 2 minute sonication). In this study, we repeatedly opened the BBB in the caudate and putamen regions of the basal ganglia of 4 NHP using FUS with systemically-administered MB over 4-20 months. We assessed the safety of the FUS with MB procedure using MRI to detect edema or hemorrhaging in the brain. Contrast enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequences showed a 98% success rate for openings in the targeted regions. T2-weighted and SWI sequences indicated a lack edema in the majority of the cases. We investigated potential neurological effects of the FUS with MB procedure through quantitative cognitive testing of' visual, cognitive, motivational, and motor function using a random dot motion task with reward magnitude bias presented on a touchpanel display. Reaction times during the task significantly increased on the day of the FUS with MB procedure. This increase returned to baseline within 4-5 days after the procedure. Visual motion discrimination thresholds were unaffected. Our results indicate FUS with MB can be a safe method for repeated opening of the BBB at the basal ganglia in NHP for up to 20 months without any long-term negative physiological or neurological effects with the parameters used.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBlood-Brain BarrierBrainCognitionEchoencephalographyMacaca fascicularisMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMicrobubblesSafetySonication

Identifiers

PMID25945493
PMCPMC4422704
OpenAlexW1953231210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.