Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25945286›Full record

ReviewAdvances in wound care2015

Syndecan-1 and Its Expanding List of Contacts.

Mary Ann Stepp, Sonali Pal-Ghosh, Gauri Tadvalkar, Ahdeah Pajoohesh-Ganji

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in wound care, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. SDC1 is a critical transmembrane proteoglycan in breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary Ann SteppDepartment of Anatomy and Regenerative Biology, George Washington University Medical School , Washington, District of Columbia. ; Department of Ophthalmology, George Washington University Medical School , Washington, District of Columbia.
Sonali Pal-GhoshDepartment of Anatomy and Regenerative Biology, George Washington University Medical School , Washington, District of Columbia.
Gauri TadvalkarDepartment of Anatomy and Regenerative Biology, George Washington University Medical School , Washington, District of Columbia.
Ahdeah Pajoohesh-GanjiDepartment of Anatomy and Regenerative Biology, George Washington University Medical School , Washington, District of Columbia.
George Washington University · US

Funding

Molecular mechanisms of corneal recurrent erosion formationR01EY008512 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STEPP, MARY ANN · 1990 to 2024
$11.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID25945286
PMCPMC4397989
OpenAlexW2064737300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.