Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25944585›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2015

Validating CFD Predictions of Pharmaceutical Aerosol Deposition with In Vivo Data.

Geng Tian, Michael Hindle, Sau Lee, P Worth Longest

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. A computed tomography imaging-based subject-specific whole-lung deposition model.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Geng TianDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 West Main Street, P.O. Box 843015, Richmond, Virginia, 23284-3015, USA.
Michael HindleDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Sau LeeOffice of Pharmaceutical Quality, Center for Drug Evaluation Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
P Worth LongestDepartment of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, 401 West Main Street, P.O. Box 843015, Richmond, Virginia, 23284-3015, USA. pwlongest@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University · USCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

High Efficiency Aerosol Delivery using the Excipient Enhanced Growth Concept: A Human Proof of Concept StudyR01HL107333 · NHLBI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI HINDLE, MICHAEL, LONGEST, P. WORTH · 2011 to 2020
$4.2M
Predictive Lung Deposition Models for Safety and Efficacy of Orally Inhaled DrugU01FD004570 · FDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI LONGEST, P. WORTH · 2012 to 2014
$347k
FDA HHS U01 FD004570NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL107333
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCFD provides a powerful approach to evaluate the deposition of pharmaceutical aerosols; however, previous studies have not compared CFD results of deposition throughout the lungs with in vivo data.

methodsThe in vivo datasets selected for comparison with CFD predictions included fast and slow clearance of monodisperse aerosols as well as 2D gamma scintigraphy measurements for a dry powder inhaler (DPI) and softmist inhaler (SMI). The CFD model included the inhaler, a characteristic model of the mouth-throat (MT) and upper tracheobronchial (TB) airways, stochastic individual pathways (SIPs) representing the remaining TB region, and recent CFD-based correlations to predict pharmaceutical aerosol deposition in the alveolar airways.

resultsFor the monodisperse aerosol, CFD predictions of total lung deposition agreed with in vivo data providing a percent relative error of 6% averaged across aerosol sizes of 1-7 μm. With the DPI and SMI, deposition was evaluated in the MT, central airways (bifurcations B1-B7), and intermediate plus peripheral airways (B8 through alveoli). Across these regions, CFD predictions produced an average relative error <10% for each inhaler.

conclusionsCFD simulations with the SIP modeling approach were shown to accurately predict regional deposition throughout the lungs for multiple aerosol types and different in vivo assessment methods.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAerosolsComputer SimulationDrug Delivery SystemsDry Powder InhalersHumansLungModels, AnatomicModels, TheoreticalParticle SizeTissue DistributionAerosolsairway dosimetry predictionscomputational fluid dynamics (CFD)pharmaceutical aerosolspredictions of aerosol depositionrespiratory drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID25944585
PMCPMC4580521
OpenAlexW1915635001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.