Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25944532›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2015

Evaluation of agar dilution and broth microdilution methods to determine the disinfectant susceptibility.

Guoyan Wu, Qianru Yang, Mei Long, Lijuan Guo, Bei Li, Yue Meng, Anyun Zhang, Hongning Wang, Shuliang Liu, Likou Zou

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effect of Kaempferol against Biofilm Formation byRecent patents on biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. DecodingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  15. Occurrence, genetic diversity and resistance profiles ofJournal of food science and technology · 2024
    Article
  16. Draft genome sequence of probiotic bacteriumMicrobiology resource announcements · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Guoyan WuCollege of Resources and Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Qianru YangDepartment of Food Science, Louisiana State University Agriculture Center, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Mei LongThe Laboratory of Microbiology, Dujiangyan Campus of Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Lijuan GuoCollege of Resources and Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Bei LiThe Laboratory of Microbiology, Dujiangyan Campus of Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yue MengThe Laboratory of Microbiology, Dujiangyan Campus of Sichuan Agricultural University, Dujiangyan, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Anyun ZhangAnimal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Hongning WangAnimal Disease Prevention and Food Safety Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, School of Life Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.
Shuliang LiuDepartment of Food Quality and Safety, College of Food Science, Sichuan Agricultural University, Ya'an, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Likou ZouCollege of Resources and Environment, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CNSichuan University · CNLouisiana State University Agricultural Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of disinfectants have been widely used in veterinary hygiene, food industries and environments, which could induce the development of bacterial resistance to disinfectants. The methods used to investigate antimicrobial effects of disinfectant vary considerably among studies, making comparisons difficult. In this study, agar dilution and broth microdilution methods were used to compare the antimicrobial activities of four quaternary ammonium compounds (QACs) against foodborne and zoonotic pathogens. The potential relationship between the presence of QACs resistance genes and phenotypic resistance to QACs was also investigated. Our results indicated that the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined by two methods might be different depended upon different QACs and bacteria applied. Regardless of the testing methods, Klebsiella pneumoniae was more tolerant among Gram-negative strains to four QACs, followed by Salmonella and Escherichia coli. The agreement between MICs obtained by the two methods was good, for benzalkonium chloride (78.15%), didecyldimethylammonium chloride (DDAC) (82.35%), cetylpyridinium chloride (CTPC) (97.48%) and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) (99.16%), respectively. Among all Gram-negative bacteria, 94.55% (n=52) of qacEΔ1-positive strains showed higher MICs (512 mg l(-1)) to CTAB. The qacEΔ1 gene was highly associated (P<0.05) with the high MICs of QACs (⩾512 mg l(-1)). In addition, DDAC remained as the most effective disinfectant against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. This is the first study that compared the agar dilution and broth microdilution methods to assess the antimicrobial activity of QACs. The study demonstrated the need to standardize method that would be used in evaluating QACs antimicrobial properties in the future.

Indexed as

AgarBacteriaDisinfectantsDrug Resistance, BacterialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAgarDisinfectantsQuaternary Ammonium Compounds

Identifiers

PMID25944532
OpenAlexW260909449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.