Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25944504›Full record

ArticleDisability and health journal2015

"How did that happen?" Public responses to women with mobility disability during pregnancy.

Lisa I Iezzoni, Amy J Wint, Suzanne C Smeltzer, Jeffrey L Ecker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and health journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pregnancy Decision-Making Among Women With Physical Disabilities: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa I IezzoniMongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, USA. Electronic address: liezzoni@mgh.harvard.org.
Amy J WintMongan Institute for Health Policy, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA.
Suzanne C SmeltzerCenter for Nursing Research, Villanova University College of Nursing, USA.
Jeffrey L EckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Harvard Medical School, USA.

Funding

Pregnancy Experience of Women with Physical DisabilitiesR21HD068756 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI IEZZONI, LISA I. · 2012 to 2013
$469k
NICHD NIH HHS 1R21HD068756-02NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD068756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about current societal attitudes toward women with significant mobility disability who are visibly pregnant.

objectiveTo use qualitative descriptive analysis methods to examine perceptions of women with significant mobility disability about how strangers reacted to their visible pregnancies.

methodsIn late 2013, we conducted 2-h telephone interviews with 22 women with significant mobility difficulties who had delivered babies within the prior 10 years. The semi-structured, open-ended interview protocol addressed wide-ranging pregnancy-related topics, including statements from strangers. Most participants were recruited through social networks, coming from 17 states nationwide. We used NVivo to sort the texts for content analysis.

resultsThe women's mean (standard deviation) age was 34.8 (5.3) years; most were white, well-educated, and higher income, although half had Medicaid during their pregnancies; and 18 used wheeled mobility aids. Eighteen women described memorable interactions with strangers relating to their pregnancies or newborn babies. Strangers' statements fell into six categories: (1) curious; (2) intrusively and persistently curious; (3) hostile, including concerns that taxpayers would end up supporting the mother and child; (4) questioning woman's competence as a potential parent; (5) oblivious, not recognizing visible pregnancy or motherhood; and (6) positive. Many women reported strangers asking how their pregnancy had happened. The women doubted that visibly pregnant women without disabilities evoke the same reactions from strangers.

conclusionsWomen with mobility disability who are visibly pregnant may perceive reactions from strangers that appear intrusive. Planning ahead for handling such encounters could reduce the stresses of these interactions.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsMothersPersons with DisabilitiesPrejudiceStereotypingAdultChildChild, PreschoolExploratory BehaviorFemaleHostilityHumansInfantMiddle AgedMobility LimitationPerceptionDisabilityPregnancyPublicQualitative researchSocietal attitudes

Identifiers

PMID25944504
PMCPMC4795154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.