ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2015
Osteoblasts Have a Neural Origin in Heterotopic Ossification.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurogenic heterotopic ossification: from molecular mechanisms to clinical treatment.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Neuro-Immune Axis in Trauma-Induced Heterotopic Ossification: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications.Cells · 2026Review
- Review
- Denervation‑induced NRG3 aggravates muscle heterotopic ossification via the ErbB4/PI3K/Akt signaling pathway.Molecular medicine reports · 2025Article
- The Role of Neuromodulation and Potential Mechanism in Regulating Heterotopic Ossification.Neurochemical research · 2024Review
- Novel insights from human induced pluripotent stem cells on origins and roles of fibro/adipogenic progenitors as heterotopic ossification precursors.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- TrkA+ Neurons Induce Pathologic Regeneration After Soft Tissue Trauma.Stem cells translational medicine · 2022Article
- Pathophysiology and Emerging Molecular Therapeutic Targets in Heterotopic Ossification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Heterotopic Ossification: Clinical Features, Basic Researches, and Mechanical Stimulations.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Sensory nerves: A driver of the vicious cycle in bone metastasis?Journal of bone oncology · 2021Review
- NGF-TrkA signaling dictates neural ingrowth and aberrant osteochondral differentiation after soft tissue trauma.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Burn-induced heterotopic ossification from incidence to therapy: key signaling pathways underlying ectopic bone formation.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2021Review
- Crosstalk between Bone and Nerves within Bone.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- A replicating stem-like cell that contributes to bone morphogenetic protein 2-induced heterotopic bone formation.Stem cells translational medicine · 2021Article
- Melatonin Promotes Heterotopic Ossification Through Regulation of Endothelial-Mesenchymal Transition in Injured Achilles Tendons in Rats.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Telocytes in the Normal and Pathological Peripheral Nervous System.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Neurotrophin-3 acts on the endothelial-mesenchymal transition of heterotopic ossification in rats.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2019Article
- Pericytes as a Source of Osteogenic Cells in Bone Fracture Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Review
- Trauma-Induced Heterotopic Ossification Regulates the Blood-Nerve Barrier.Frontiers in neurology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeterotopic ossification (HO) is the process of bone formation at a nonskeletal site. Recently, we showed that the earliest steps occur in sensory nerves. We now extend these studies by identifying unique osteogenic progenitors within the endoneurial compartment of sensory nerves. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What is the nature of the osteoprogenitor in the endoneurium of peripheral nerves? (2) How do osteoprogenitors travel from the nerve to the site of new bone formation?
methodsHO was induced by intramuscular injection of Ad5BMP-2-transduced cells in mice. Osteoprogenitors were identified through immunohistochemistry and then quantified and further characterized by fluorescence-activated cell sorting and immunocytochemistry. The kinetics of the appearance of markers of extravasation was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. In each experiment mice were injected with bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2)-producing cells (experimental) or with cells transduced with empty vector or, in some cases, a group receiving no injection (control).
resultsInduction of HO leads to the expression, within 24 hours, of osteoblast-specific transcription factors in cells in the endoneurium followed by their coordinate disappearance from the nerve at 48 hours. They reappear in blood also at 48 hours after induction. During vessel entrance they begin to express the tight junction molecule, claudin 5. The cells expressing both the osteoblast-specific transcription factor, osterix, as well as claudin 5, then disappear from circulation at approximately 3 to 4 days by extravasation into the site of new bone formation. These endoneurial osteoprogenitors express neural markers PDGFRα, musashi-1, and the low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor p75(NTR) as well as the endothelial marker Tie-2. In a key experiment, cells that were obtained from mice that were injected with cells transduced with an empty vector, at 2 days after injection, contained 0.83% (SD, 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59-1.05) cells expressing claudin 5. However, cells that were obtained from mice 2 days after injection of BMP-2-producing cells contained 4.5% cells expressing claudin 5 (SD, 0.72%; 95% CI, 2.01-6.94; p < 0.0015). Further analysis revealed that all of the cells expressing claudin 5 were found to be positive for osteoblast-specific markers, whereas cells not expressing claudin 5 were negative for these same markers.
conclusionsThe findings suggest that the endoneurial progenitors are the major osteogenic precursors that are used for HO. They exit the nerve through the endoneurial vessels, flow through vessels to the site of new bone formation, and then extravasate out of the vessels into this site. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The biogenesis of osteoblasts in HO is very different than expected and shows that HO is, at least in part, a neurological disorder. This could result in a major shift in orthopaedic methodologies to prevent or treat this disease. The fact that nerves are intimately involved in the process may also provide clues that will lead to an explanation of the clinical fact that HO often occurs as a result of traumatic brain injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.