Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25944357›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2015

Nuclear roles for actin.

Natalia Wesolowska, Péter Lénárt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Regulation of actin isoforms in cellular and developmental processes.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  7. Posttranscriptional and Posttranslational Regulation of Actin.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2018
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalia WesolowskaCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany.
Péter LénártCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Meyerhofstrasse 1, 69117, Heidelberg, Germany. lenart@embl.de.
European Bioinformatics Institute · GBEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Actin's presence in the nucleus is a subject that has ignited a lot of controversy in the past. With our review, we attempt to reach out not only to the specialists but also to a broader audience that might be skeptical in light of the controversies. We take a rather conservative approach to build an argument that recent studies provide multiple independent lines of evidence substantiating actin's diverse nuclear functions, especially in its monomeric state. We then particularly focus on how the concentration of monomeric actin, and potentially of specific polymerized forms of actin, can be used by the cell as indicators of cellular state and how this information can be transduced into the nucleus by transcriptional regulators, eliciting a response. We also provide examples that in specific cell types and specific physiological conditions, actin is functional in the nucleus in its polymeric form. However, we also discuss that in many instances, the presence of actin regulators in the nucleus, which is often seen as proof of their function within this compartment, may simply reflect an additional means of their regulation by compartmentalization.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalsCell NucleusEukaryotaHumansActinsActinCytoskeletonNucleocytoplasmic transportNucleusTranscription factors

Identifiers

PMID25944357
OpenAlexW274340022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.