Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25944300›Full record

ArticleVaccine2015

Oral delivery of wafers made from HBsAg-expressing maize germ induces long-term immunological systemic and mucosal responses.

Celine A Hayden, Maria E Fischer, Bryan L Andrews, Hayley C Chilton, Debra D Turner, John H Walker, Ian R Tizard, John A Howard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Edible plants for oral delivery of biopharmaceuticals.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Celine A HaydenApplied Biotechnology Institute, Cal Poly Tech Park, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Maria E FischerApplied Biotechnology Institute, Cal Poly Tech Park, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Bryan L AndrewsApplied Biotechnology Institute, Cal Poly Tech Park, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Hayley C ChiltonApplied Biotechnology Institute, Cal Poly Tech Park, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Debra D TurnerDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
John H WalkerDepartment of Statistics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA.
Ian R TizardDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
John A HowardApplied Biotechnology Institute, Cal Poly Tech Park, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA. Electronic address: jhoward@appliedbiotech.org.

Funding

An Orally Delivered Booster Vaccine Candidate for Hepatitis BR44AI068239 · NIAID · APPLIED BIOTECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE · PI HOWARD, JOHN A. · 2012 to 2014
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS 2R44AI068239-03A1NIAID NIH HHS R44 AI068239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) has been administered over the last 20 years as a parenteral vaccine against the hepatitis B virus (HBV). Despite high seroconversion rates, chronic infection rates are still high worldwide. Orally delivered vaccines provide a practical alternative to injected vaccines, potentially helping poorly responding populations and providing a viable alternative for populations in remote locations. Anamnestic responses are vital to establishing the efficacy of a given vaccine and have been assessed in this study using a plant-based oral delivery platform expressing HBsAg.

methodsLong-term immunological memory was assessed in mice injected with a primary dose of Recombivax and boosted with orally-delivered HBsAg wafers, control wafers, or parenterally-delivered commercial vaccine (Recombivax).

resultsMice boosted with HBsAg orally-administered wafers displayed sharp increases in mucosal IgA titers in fecal material and steep increases in serum IgA, whereas mice boosted with Recombivax showed no detectable levels of IgA in either fecal or serum samples following four boosting treatments. Long-term memory in the orally-treated mice was evidenced by sustained fecal IgA, and serum IgA, IgG, and mIU/mL over one year, while Recombivax-treated mice displayed sustained serum IgG and mIU/mL. Furthermore, sharp increases in these same antibodies were induced after re-boosting at 47 and 50 weeks post-primary injection.

conclusionsOrally-delivered vaccines can provide long-term immune responses mucosally and systemically. For sexually-transmitted diseases that can be acquired at mucosal surfaces, such as HBV, an oral delivery platform may provide added protection over a conventional parenterally administered vaccine.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalImmunologic MemoryAdministration, OralAnimalsEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B, ChronicHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B VaccinesImmunization, SecondaryImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryImmunoglobulin GMice, Inbred BALB CVaccinationVaccines, SubunitHepatitis B AntibodiesHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin A, SecretoryImmunoglobulin GRecombivax HBVaccines, SubunitVaccines, SyntheticAnamnestic responseBioencapsulationImmunogenicityLong-term immune memoryMaize oral vaccineMucosalPlant vaccineSubunit vaccineSupercritical fluid extraction

Identifiers

PMID25944300
PMCPMC4445721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.