Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25944275›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2015

[Differential diagnostics of dementia type diseases].

W Reith, R Mühl-Benninghaus

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

W ReithKlinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Straße, 66424, Homburg/Saar, Deutschland, Wolfgang.Reith@uniklinikum-saarland.de.
R Mühl-Benninghaus
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dementia remains the most common neuropsychiatric disease in elderly people. This is not only a great burden for the affected person, but also for the entire society. Currently, it is estimated that more than one million people in Germany suffer from dementia. The incidence is about 244,000 people per year. There are different forms of dementia. Primary dementia is caused by neurodegenerative or vascular diseases. Approximately 90% of all dementia types in people over 65 years of age are primary. Secondary dementia includes organic illness, which leads to dementing syndromes. Traumatic brain injury, tumor, medication and toxic substances, for instance, belong to these. Usually, if the underlying disease can be treated effectively, mental performance and cognition can be returned to normal.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesDementiaDiagnosis, DifferentialGermanyHumans

Identifiers

PMID25944275
OpenAlexW254874185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.