Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25943794›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2015

Imaging learned fear circuitry in awake mice using fMRI.

Anjanette P Harris, Ross J Lennen, Ian Marshall, Maurits A Jansen, Cyril R Pernet, Nichola M Brydges, Ian C Duguid, Megan C Holmes

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Where do we stand on fMRI in awake mice?Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. High-resolution awake mouse fMRI at 14 Tesla.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anjanette P HarrisBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
Ross J LennenBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
Ian MarshallCentre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Maurits A JansenBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
Cyril R PernetNeuroimaging Sciences, Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK.
Nichola M BrydgesNeuroscience and Mental Health Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Ian C DuguidIntegrative Physics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Megan C HolmesBHF Centre for Cardiovascular Sciences, QMRI, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK.
University of Edinburgh · GBCardiff University · GBThe Queen's Medical Research Institute · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilMedical Research Council G0700704Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of learned behaviour in 'awake rodents' provides the opportunity for translational preclinical studies into the influence of pharmacological and genetic manipulations on brain function. fMRI has recently been employed to investigate learned behaviour in awake rats. Here, this methodology is translated to mice, so that future fMRI studies may exploit the vast number of genetically modified mouse lines that are available. One group of mice was conditioned to associate a flashing light (conditioned stimulus, CS) with foot shock (PG; paired group), and another group of mice received foot shock and flashing light explicitly unpaired (UG; unpaired group). The blood oxygen level-dependent signal (proxy for neuronal activation) in response to the CS was measured 24 h later in awake mice from the PG and UG using fMRI. The amygdala, implicated in fear processing, was activated to a greater degree in the PG than in the UG in response to the CS. Additionally, the nucleus accumbens was activated in the UG in response to the CS. Because the CS signalled an absence of foot shock in the UG, it is possible that this region is involved in processing the safety aspect of the CS. To conclude, the first use of fMRI to visualise brain activation in awake mice that are completing a learned emotional task is reported. This work paves the way for future preclinical fMRI studies to investigate genetic and environmental influences on brain function in transgenic mouse models of disease and aging.

Indexed as

AnimalsAssociation LearningBrainBrain MappingCerebrovascular CirculationConditioning, PsychologicalElectroshockFearFeasibility StudiesFootMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMotionNeural PathwaysOxygenOxygenamygdalaawake mouse fMRIcued fear conditioningnucleus accumbensPavlovian conditioning

Identifiers

PMID25943794
PMCPMC4744695
OpenAlexW2169347869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.