ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2015
[Multiphoton tomography].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- S1 guideline for imaging diagnostics for skin diseases.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2025Guideline
- Artificial intelligence in atopic dermatitis: Current applications and future perspectives.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- [New optical examination procedures for the diagnosis of skin diseases].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020Review
- Non-invasive imaging in dermatology and the unique potential of raster-scan optoacoustic mesoscopy.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2019Review
- Multiphoton microscopy in the diagnostic assessment of pediatric solid tissue in comparison to conventional histopathology: results of the first international online interobserver trial.Cancer management and research · 2019Article
- Real-time optical diagnosis of gastric cancer with serosal invasion using multiphoton imaging.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- [Methods for measuring skin aging].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, multiphoton tomography (MPT) and multiphoton microscopy have gained increasing importance as noninvasive examination techniques in dermatology. MPT imaging is based on the specific stimulation of biogenic fluorophores. The induction of second harmonic generation is also used for imaging of particular molecules. Additional fluorescence staining or fluorescence markers are not necessary-an important advantage for the in vivo examination of human skin. Multiphoton techniques are not only appropriate for clinical diagnostics but also for biomedical research. MPT provides an optical biopsy depth up to 200 µm with subcellular resolution depicting cellular and extracellular structures. In combination with fluorescence lifetime imaging, additional information about the microenvironment, the energetic state and the cellular metabolism can be obtained. This review presents recent developments of MPT for the in vivo evaluation of physiological and pathological changes of skin and diagnostics of dermal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25943693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.