Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25943550›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2015

An end-to-end hybrid algorithm for automated medication discrepancy detection.

Qi Li, Stephen Andrew Spooner, Megan Kaiser, Nataline Lingren, Jessica Robbins, Todd Lingren, Huaxiu Tang, Imre Solti, Yizhao Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare.An international journal on information fusion · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. 2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Qi LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Stephen Andrew SpoonerDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Megan KaiserDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Nataline LingrenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Jessica RobbinsDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Todd LingrenDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Huaxiu TangDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Imre SoltiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA.
Yizhao NiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, MLC 7024, Cincinnati, OH, 45229-3039, USA. Yizhao.Ni@cchmc.org.

Funding

Better Outcomes for Children: GWAS & PheWAS in eMERGEII.U01HG006828 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HARLEY, JOHN BARKER, HOLM, INGRID ADELE · 2012 to 2014
$4.0M
Increasing Clinical Trial Enrollment: A Semi-Automated Patient Centered ApproachR00LM010227 · NLM · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SOLTI, IMRE · 2010 to 2012
$727k
EHR-based patient safety: Automated error detection in neonatal intensive careR21HD072883 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SOLTI, IMRE · 2012 to 2013
$407k
NHGRI NIH HHS 5U01HG006828-03NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006828NICHD NIH HHS 1R21HD072883-01NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD072883NLM NIH HHS 5R00LM010227-05NLM NIH HHS R00 LM010227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study we implemented and developed state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) technologies and built a computerized algorithm for medication reconciliation. Our specific aims are: (1) to develop a computerized algorithm for medication discrepancy detection between patients' discharge prescriptions (structured data) and medications documented in free-text clinical notes (unstructured data); and (2) to assess the performance of the algorithm on real-world medication reconciliation data.

methodsWe collected clinical notes and discharge prescription lists for all 271 patients enrolled in the Complex Care Medical Home Program at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2013. A double-annotated, gold-standard set of medication reconciliation data was created for this collection. We then developed a hybrid algorithm consisting of three processes: (1) a ML algorithm to identify medication entities from clinical notes, (2) a rule-based method to link medication names with their attributes, and (3) a NLP-based, hybrid approach to match medications with structured prescriptions in order to detect medication discrepancies. The performance was validated on the gold-standard medication reconciliation data, where precision (P), recall (R), F-value (F) and workload were assessed.

resultsThe hybrid algorithm achieved 95.0%/91.6%/93.3% of P/R/F on medication entity detection and 98.7%/99.4%/99.1% of P/R/F on attribute linkage. The medication matching achieved 92.4%/90.7%/91.5% (P/R/F) on identifying matched medications in the gold-standard and 88.6%/82.5%/85.5% (P/R/F) on discrepant medications. By combining all processes, the algorithm achieved 92.4%/90.7%/91.5% (P/R/F) and 71.5%/65.2%/68.2% (P/R/F) on identifying the matched and the discrepant medications, respectively. The error analysis on algorithm outputs identified challenges to be addressed in order to improve medication discrepancy detection.

conclusionBy leveraging ML and NLP technologies, an end-to-end, computerized algorithm achieves promising outcome in reconciling medications between clinical notes and discharge prescriptions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingAdultDrug PrescriptionsHumansMedication ReconciliationPatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID25943550
PMCPMC4427951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.