ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2015
An end-to-end hybrid algorithm for automated medication discrepancy detection.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Natural Language Processing Applications in the Clinical Neurosciences: A Machine Learning Augmented Systematic Review.Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement · 2022Pooled it
- Natural language processing algorithms for mapping clinical text fragments onto ontology concepts: a systematic review and recommendations for future studies.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2020Pooled it
- Strategies for improving physician documentation in the emergency department: a systematic review.BMC emergency medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: A systematic review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- AI-Based Automation for Medication Reconciliation: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Analytical approaches for medication management for patient safety: a scoping review.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Advancements in Medical Radiology Through Multimodal Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Overview.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review of multimodal machine learning approaches in healthcare.An international journal on information fusion · 2025Article
- Article
- Gross motor function prediction using natural language processing in cerebral palsy.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2023Article
- DI++: A deep learning system for patient condition identification in clinical notes.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2022Article
- Automated detection of substance use information from electronic health records for a pediatric population.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Hybrid Deep Learning for Medication-Related Information Extraction From Clinical Texts in French: MedExt Algorithm Development Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patient Safety Outcomes: Systematic Literature Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Review
- Finding warning markers: Leveraging natural language processing and machine learning technologies to detect risk of school violence.International journal of medical informatics · 2020Article
- Clinical Text Data in Machine Learning: Systematic Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Review
- 2018 n2c2 shared task on adverse drug events and medication extraction in electronic health records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Transparent Reporting on Research Using Unstructured Electronic Health Record Data to Generate 'Real World' Evidence of Comparative Effectiveness and Safety.Drug safety · 2019Article
- The Revival of the Notes Field: Leveraging the Unstructured Content in Electronic Health Records.Frontiers in medicine · 2019Article
- Designing and evaluating an automated system for real-time medication administration error detection in a neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn this study we implemented and developed state-of-the-art machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) technologies and built a computerized algorithm for medication reconciliation. Our specific aims are: (1) to develop a computerized algorithm for medication discrepancy detection between patients' discharge prescriptions (structured data) and medications documented in free-text clinical notes (unstructured data); and (2) to assess the performance of the algorithm on real-world medication reconciliation data.
methodsWe collected clinical notes and discharge prescription lists for all 271 patients enrolled in the Complex Care Medical Home Program at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center between 1/1/2010 and 12/31/2013. A double-annotated, gold-standard set of medication reconciliation data was created for this collection. We then developed a hybrid algorithm consisting of three processes: (1) a ML algorithm to identify medication entities from clinical notes, (2) a rule-based method to link medication names with their attributes, and (3) a NLP-based, hybrid approach to match medications with structured prescriptions in order to detect medication discrepancies. The performance was validated on the gold-standard medication reconciliation data, where precision (P), recall (R), F-value (F) and workload were assessed.
resultsThe hybrid algorithm achieved 95.0%/91.6%/93.3% of P/R/F on medication entity detection and 98.7%/99.4%/99.1% of P/R/F on attribute linkage. The medication matching achieved 92.4%/90.7%/91.5% (P/R/F) on identifying matched medications in the gold-standard and 88.6%/82.5%/85.5% (P/R/F) on discrepant medications. By combining all processes, the algorithm achieved 92.4%/90.7%/91.5% (P/R/F) and 71.5%/65.2%/68.2% (P/R/F) on identifying the matched and the discrepant medications, respectively. The error analysis on algorithm outputs identified challenges to be addressed in order to improve medication discrepancy detection.
conclusionBy leveraging ML and NLP technologies, an end-to-end, computerized algorithm achieves promising outcome in reconciling medications between clinical notes and discharge prescriptions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.