Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25943399›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Midwives' perspectives of their ability to promote the oral health of pregnant women in Victoria, Australia.

Adina Y Heilbrunn-Lang, Andrea M de Silva, Gillian Lang, Ajesh George, Allison Ridge, Maree Johnson, Sameer Bhole, Carole Gilmour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Behaviour of Midwives Concerning Periodontal Health of Pregnant Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adina Y Heilbrunn-LangCentre for Applied Oral Health Research, Dental Health Services Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Adina.Heilbrunn@dhsv.org.au.
Andrea M de SilvaCentre for Applied Oral Health Research, Dental Health Services Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Andrea.deSilva@dhsv.org.au.
Gillian LangHealth Promotion, Dental Health Services Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Gillian.Lang@dhsv.org.au.
Ajesh GeorgeCentre for Applied Nursing Research, University of Western Sydney/ South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia. A.George@uws.edu.au.
Allison RidgeHealth Promotion, Dental Health Services Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. Allison.Ridge@dhsv.org.au.
Maree JohnsonFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Sydney, Australia. Maree.Johnson@acu.edu.au.
Sameer BholeFaculty of Dentistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Sameer.Bhole@sswahs.nsw.gov.au.
Carole GilmourAustralian College of Midwifery Victorian Branch, Melbourne, Australia. carolegilmour@bigpond.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidwives have a potential role in promoting the oral health of pregnant women although they have little formal training in this area. The aim of this study was to explore the perspectives of midwives in Victoria towards incorporating oral health promotion into their antenatal practice after undergoing training through the Midwifery Initiated Oral Health (MIOH) online education program.

methodsA purposive sample of thirty-nine midwives from maternity services across Victoria, Australia were invited to participate in an online MIOH education program in October 2012. The program included three self-paced modules covering oral health screening, referral processes, and theoretical and practical skill assessments. A mixed methods design was used to capture midwives perspectives. Evaluation questionnaires, completed pre- and post-training, captured knowledge and confidence (confidence likert scale), and also included five opened-ended questions post-training. Open-ended questions, feedback forms and unsolicited emails formed the data for qualitative analysis. Data were analysed using content and thematic analysis and descriptive statistics.

resultsThirty-three midwives completed the MIOH education program and demonstrated a significant increase (51.5%) in their confidence to promote oral health. All participants viewed the program as suitable, acceptable and useful for their practice and were happy to recommend the course to other Victorian midwives. Participants indicated that it would be feasible to incorporate oral health into the first antenatal booking visit and recognised that oral health promotion was within their scope of practice.

conclusionsThis study has shown that the MIOH education program is a valued resource that can assist midwives to increase their confidence and skills to incorporate oral health promotion into their practice. A key barrier identified was time constraints during antenatal care booking visits. However, it is evident that with relevant training it would be feasible and acceptable for Victorian midwives to incorporate oral health promotion within their practice. The current engagement with midwives in Victoria and other parts of Australia provides an opportunity to continue to explore and define the role of antenatal health care professionals in oral health promotion at a state and national level.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth PromotionOral HealthPregnant PeopleFemaleHumansMidwiferyNurse MidwivesNurse-Patient RelationsPregnancyPrenatal CareProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesVictoria

Identifiers

PMID25943399
PMCPMC4490712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.