SynthesisBMJ open2015
Who is in control? Clinicians' view on their role in self-management approaches: a qualitative metasynthesis.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- 2021 EULAR recommendations for the implementation of self-management strategies in patients with inflammatory arthritis.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2021Guideline
- What are the attitudes of health professionals regarding patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in oncology practice? A mixed-method synthesis of the qualitative evidence.BMC health services research · 2020Pooled it
- An extended stroke rehabilitation service for people who have had a stroke: the EXTRAS RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Trial
- Pilot trial of The Living Well Toolkit: qualitative analysis and implications for refinement and future implementation.BMC health services research · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Applying a cognitive behavioural approach in COPD: views of respiratory professionals.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- How important are working relationships for stroke self-management? A qualitative study with healthcare professionals in community stroke teams.Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Reflecting on challenges and opportunities for the practice of person-centred rehabilitation.Clinical rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Healthcare provider's perspectives on home blood pressure management in Peru and Cameroon: Findings from the BPMONITOR study.Preventive medicine reports · 2023Article
- Embedding the living well toolkit into service delivery - A complex process.PEC innovation · 2022Article
- Healthcare providers' and policymakers' experiences and perspectives on barriers and facilitators to chronic disease self-management for people living with hypertension and diabetes in Cameroon.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Patients' and family caregivers' experiences and perceptions about factors hampering or facilitating patient empowerment for self-management of hypertension and diabetes in Cameroon.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Patient-Centred Care for Patients With Diabetes and HIV at a Public Tertiary Hospital in South Africa: An Ethnographic Study.International journal of health policy and management · 2021Article
- Management of Cancer and Health After the Clinic Visit: A Call to Action for Self-Management in Cancer Care.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- "Standing on common ground" - a qualitative study of self-management support for patients with multimorbidity in primary health care.BMC family practice · 2020Article
- Patients' Experiences of Using Smartphone Apps to Support Self-Management and Improve Medication Adherence in Hypertension: Qualitative Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- Implementing Supported Self-Management in Community-Based Stroke Care: A Secondary Analysis of Nurses' Perspectives.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- A Scoping Review of Self-Management Interventions Following Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Development of a toolkit to enhance care processes for people with a long-term neurological condition: a qualitative descriptive study.BMJ open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore clinician perceptions of involvement in delivery of self-management approaches.
settingAll healthcare settings.
designEBSCO, Scopus and AMED databases were searched, in July 2013, for peer-reviewed studies in English reporting original qualitative data concerning perceptions of clinicians regarding their involvement in or integration of a self-management approach. Of 1930 studies identified, 1889 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Full text of 41 studies were reviewed by two independent reviewers; 14 papers were included for metasynthesis. Findings and discussion sections were imported into Nvivo-10 and coded line-by-line. Codes were organised into descriptive themes and cross-checked against original sources to check interpretation, and refined iteratively until findings represented an agreed understanding. Studies were appraised for quality.
resultsDelivering self-management in practice appeared to be a complex process for many clinicians. The issue of 'control' arose in all studies, both in the qualitative data and authors' interpretations. The first theme: Who is in control?--represented ways clinicians talked of exercising control over patients and the control they expected patients to have over their condition. The second theme: Changing clinician views--reflected what appeared to be an essential transformation of practice experienced by some clinicians in the process of integrating self-management approaches into the practice. A range of challenges associated with shifting towards a self-management approach were reflected in the third theme, Overcoming challenges to change. Tensions appeared to exist around forming partnerships with patients. Strategies found helpful in the process of change included: dedicating time to practice reciprocity in communication style, peer support and self-reflection.
conclusionsA consistent finding across studies is that 'control' is a key feature of how self-management is viewed by clinicians. They described challenges associated with the paradigm shift required to share or let go of control. Future research should identify whether strategies described by clinicians are key to successful self-management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.