ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Field phenotyping of grapevine growth using dense stereo reconstruction.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancements in 3D field-crop phenotyping using point clouds: a comparative review of sensor technology, target traits, and challenges under controlled and field conditions.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Potential Phenotyping Methodologies to Assess Inter- and Intravarietal Variability and to Select Grapevine Genotypes Tolerant to Abiotic Stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Review
- Tackling microbial threats in agriculture with integrative imaging and computational approaches.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Review
- Phenotypic techniques and applications in fruit trees: a review.Plant methods · 2020Review
- Measuring crops in 3D: using geometry for plant phenotyping.Plant methods · 2019Review
- Image-based dynamic quantification and high-accuracy 3D evaluation of canopy structure of plant populations.Annals of botany · 2018Article
- A new image-based tool for the high throughput phenotyping of pollen viability: evaluation of inter- and intra-cultivar diversity in grapevine.Plant methods · 2018Article
- Plant phenomics: an overview of image acquisition technologies and image data analysis algorithms.GigaScience · 2017Review
- Phenoliner: A New Field Phenotyping Platform for Grapevine Research.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Natural Inspired Intelligent Visual Computing and Its Application to Viticulture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Breeding next generation tree fruits: technical and legal challenges.Horticulture research · 2017Review
- A novel 3D imaging system for strawberry phenotyping.Plant methods · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe demand for high-throughput and objective phenotyping in plant research has been increasing during the last years due to large experimental sites. Sensor-based, non-invasive and automated processes are needed to overcome the phenotypic bottleneck, which limits data volumes on account of manual evaluations. A major challenge for sensor-based phenotyping in vineyards is the distinction between the grapevine in the foreground and the field in the background - this is especially the case for red-green-blue (RGB) images, where similar color distributions occur both in the foreground plant and in the field and background plants. However, RGB cameras are a suitable tool in the field because they provide high-resolution data at fast acquisition rates with robustness to outdoor illumination.
resultsThis study presents a method to segment the phenotypic classes 'leaf', 'stem', 'grape' and 'background' in RGB images that were taken with a standard consumer camera in vineyards. Background subtraction is achieved by taking two images of each plant for depth reconstruction. The color information is furthermore used to distinguish the leaves from stem and grapes in the foreground. The presented approach allows for objective computation of phenotypic traits like 3D leaf surface areas and fruit-to-leaf ratios. The method has been successfully applied to objective assessment of growth habits of new breeding lines. To this end, leaf areas of two breeding lines were monitored and compared with traditional cultivars. A statistical analysis of the method shows a significant (p <0.001) determination coefficient R (2)= 0.93 and root-mean-square error of 3.0%.
conclusionsThe presented approach allows for non-invasive, fast and objective assessment of plant growth. The main contributions of this study are 1) the robust segmentation of RGB images taken from a standard consumer camera directly in the field, 2) in particular, the robust background subtraction via reconstruction of dense depth maps, and 3) phenotypic applications to monitoring of plant growth and computation of fruit-to-leaf ratios in 3D. This advance provides a promising tool for high-throughput, automated image acquisition, e.g., for field robots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.