Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25943104›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2015

Activation of defence pathways in Scots pine bark after feeding by pine weevil (Hylobius abietis).

Andriy Kovalchuk, Tommaso Raffaello, Emad Jaber, Susanna Keriö, Rajendra Ghimire, W Walter Lorenz, Jeffrey F D Dean, Jarmo K Holopainen, Fred O Asiegbu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genes · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Andriy KovalchukDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland. Andriy.Kovalchuk@helsinki.fi.
Tommaso RaffaelloDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland. Tommaso.Raffaello@helsinki.fi.
Emad JaberDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland. Emad.Jaber@helsinki.fi.
Susanna KeriöDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland. Susanna.Kerio@helsinki.fi.
Rajendra GhimireDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FIN-70211, Kuopio, Finland. Rajendra.Ghimire@uef.fi.
W Walter LorenzWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. wlorenz@uga.edu.
Jeffrey F D DeanWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA. jeffdean@bch.msstate.edu.
Jarmo K HolopainenDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FIN-70211, Kuopio, Finland. Jarmo.Holopainen@uef.fi.
Fred O AsiegbuDepartment of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 27, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland. Fred.Asiegbu@helsinki.fi.
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring their lifetime, conifer trees are exposed to numerous herbivorous insects. To protect themselves against pests, trees have developed a broad repertoire of protective mechanisms. Many of the plant's defence reactions are activated upon an insect attack, and the underlying regulatory mechanisms are not entirely understood yet, in particular in conifer trees. Here, we present the results of our studies on the transcriptional response and the volatile compounds production of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) upon the large pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) feeding.

resultsTranscriptional response of Scots pine to the weevil attack was investigated using a novel customised 36.4 K Pinus taeda microarray. The weevil feeding caused large-scale changes in the pine transcriptome. In total, 774 genes were significantly up-regulated more than 4-fold (p≤0.05), whereas 64 genes were significantly down-regulated more than 4-fold. Among the up-regulated genes, we could identify genes involved in signal perception, signalling pathways, transcriptional regulation, plant hormone homeostasis, secondary metabolism and defence responses. The weevil feeding on stem bark of pine significantly increased the total emission of volatile organic compounds from the undamaged stem bark area. The emission levels of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes were also increased. Interestingly, we could not observe any correlation between the increased production of the terpenoid compounds and expression levels of the terpene synthase-encoding genes.

conclusionsThe obtained data provide an important insight into the transcriptional response of conifer trees to insect herbivory and illustrate the massive changes in the host transcriptome upon insect attacks. Moreover, many of the induced pathways are common between conifers and angiosperms. The presented results are the first ones obtained by the use of a microarray platform with an extended coverage of pine transcriptome (36.4 K cDNA elements). The platform will further facilitate the identification of resistance markers with the direct relevance for conifer tree breeding.

Indexed as

EatingHerbivoryAnimalsCell WallGene Expression ProfilingHomeostasisPinusPlant BarkPlant Growth RegulatorsSignal TransductionTranscription, GeneticVolatile Organic CompoundsWeevilsPlant Growth RegulatorsVolatile Organic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID25943104
PMCPMC4422480
OpenAlexW1539802407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.