Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25942488›Full record

ReviewNutrients2015

Enteral nutrition in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a literature review.

Salvatore Buscemi, Giuseppe Damiano, Vincenzo D Palumbo, Gabriele Spinelli, Silvia Ficarella, Giulia Lo Monte, Antonio Marrazzo, Attilio I Lo Monte

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02941484 (A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Early Oral Intake After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Age of ERAS), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02941484 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized Trial of Early Oral Intake After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the Age of ERAS

TypeinterventionalSponsorXuzhou Medical UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled100ConditionsPeriampullary Carcinoma Resectable, PancreaticoduodenectomyArmsearly oral intake, jejunostomy tube feeding (JTF)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Tube Feed Necrosis after Major Gastrointestinal Oncologic Surgery: Institutional Lessons and a Review of the Literature.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. [Evidence-based supportive measures to secure pancreatic anastomoses].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salvatore BuscemiSchool of Oncology and Experimental Surgery, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. buscemi.salvatore@gmail.com.
Giuseppe DamianoGiaccone", University Hospital, School of Medicine, School of Biotechnology, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. giuse.damiano@gmail.com.
Vincenzo D PalumboDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Dentistry Studies, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. giuse.damiano@gmail.com.
Gabriele SpinelliDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Dentistry Studies, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. gabriele.spinelli@unipa.it.
Silvia FicarellaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Dentistry Studies, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. silvia.ficarella@gmail.com.
Giulia Lo MonteSchool of Biotechnology, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. giulialom@virgilio.it.
Antonio MarrazzoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Dentistry Studies, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. attilioignazio.lomonte@unipa.it.
Attilio I Lo MonteDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Dentistry Studies, University of Palermo, via Del Vespro 129, 90127 Palermo, Italy. giuse.damiano@gmail.com.
University of Palermo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is considered the gold standard treatment for periampullory carcinomas. This procedure presents 30%-40% of morbidity. Patients who have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy often present perioperative malnutrition that is worse in the early postoperative days, affects the process of healing, the intestinal barrier function and the number of postoperative complications. Few studies focus on the relation between enteral nutrition (EN) and postoperative complications. Our aim was to perform a review, including only randomized controlled trial meta-analyses or well-designed studies, of evidence regarding the correlation between EN and main complications and outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy, as delayed gastric emptying (DGE), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), length of stay and infectious complications. Several studies, especially randomized controlled trial have shown that EN does not increase the rate of DGE. EN appeared safe and tolerated for patients after PD, even if it did not reveal any advantages in terms of POPF, PPH, length of stay and infectious complications.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsEnteral NutritionGastroparesisHumansLength of StayMeta-Analysis as TopicPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25942488
PMCPMC4446744
OpenAlexW2155332624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.