Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25941810›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Consumption of calcium-fortified cereal bars to improve dietary calcium intake of healthy women: randomized controlled feasibility study.

Jennifer T Lee, Carolyn E Moore, John D Radcliffe

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01508689 (Effect of Calcium-fortified Cereal Bars on Dietary Calcium Intake in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01508689 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Calcium-fortified Cereal Bars on Dietary Calcium Intake in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Woman's UniversityRan2012 to 2014Enrolled36ConditionsCalcium DeficiencyArmsReceive Kellogg's Nutri-Grain® cereal bars first, Receive Kellogg's Nutri-Grain® cereal bars second
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer T LeeEpidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, United States of America.
Carolyn E MooreDepartment of Nutrition, Nutrition and Food Science, Texas Woman's University, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
John D RadcliffeDepartment of Nutrition, Nutrition and Food Science, Texas Woman's University, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledCalcium is an important structural component of the skeletal system. Although an adequate intake of calcium helps to maintain bone health and reduce the risk of osteoporosis, many women do not meet recommended daily intakes of calcium. Previous interventions studies designed to increase dietary intake of women have utilized primarily dairy sources of calcium or supplements. However, lactose intolerance, milk protein allergies, or food preferences may lead many women to exclude important dairy sources of dietary calcium. Therefore, we undertook a 9 week randomized crossover design trial to examine the potential benefit of including a non-dairy source of calcium in the diet of women. Following a 3 week run-in baseline period, 35 healthy women > 18 years were randomized by crossover design into either Group I or Group II. Group I added 2 calcium-fortified cereal bars daily (total of 400 mg calcium/day) (intervention) to their usual diet and Group II continued their usual diet (control). At the end of 3 weeks, diets were switched for another 3 weeks. Intakes of calcium and energy were estimated from 3-day diet and supplemental diaries. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for within group comparisons and Mann Whitney U tests were used for between group comparisons of calcium and energy intake. Dietary calcium was significantly higher during intervention (1071 mg/d) when participants consumed 2 calcium-fortified cereal bars daily than during the baseline (720 mg/d, P <0.0001) or control diets (775 mg/d, P = 0.0001) periods. Furthermore, the addition of 2 calcium-fortified cereal bars daily for the 3 week intervention did not significantly increase total energy intake or result in weight gain. In conclusion, consumption of calcium-fortified cereal bars significantly increased calcium intake of women. Further research examining the potential ability of fortified cereal bars to help maintain and improve bone health of women is warranted.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01508689.

Indexed as

Calcium, DietaryEdible GrainEnergy IntakeFood, FortifiedWomen's HealthAdultBody Mass IndexBody WeightCross-Over StudiesEthnicityFemaleHumansYoung AdultCalcium, Dietary

Identifiers

PMID25941810
PMCPMC4420267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.