Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25941665›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2015

Antimicrobial activities of chicken β-defensin (4 and 10) peptides against pathogenic bacteria and fungi.

Haitham A Yacoub, Ahmed M Elazzazy, Osama A H Abuzinadah, Ahmed M Al-Hejin, Maged M Mahmoud, Steve M Harakeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Poultry gut health and beyond.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Essential Oils-Based Supplement andAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of ProbioticsThe journal of poultry science · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of Oral Administration ofThe journal of poultry science · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Changes in the Expression of AvianThe journal of poultry science · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Haitham A YacoubBiological Sciences Department, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia ; Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Division, Cell Biology Department, National Research Centre Gizza, Egypt.
Ahmed M ElazzazyBiological Sciences Department, Faculty of Science, University of Jeddah Jeddah, Saudi Arabia ; Division of Pharmaceutical and Drug Industries, Department of Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products, National Research Centre Gizza, Egypt.
Osama A H AbuzinadahBiological Sciences Department, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed M Al-HejinBiological Sciences Department, Faculty of Sciences, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Maged M MahmoudKing Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia ; Division of Human Genetics and Genome Research, Department of Molecular Genetics and Enzymology, National Research Centre Gizza, Egypt.
Steve M HarakehSpecial Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdulaziz University · SANational Research Centre · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Host Defense Peptides (HDPs) are small cationic peptides found in several organisms. They play a vital role in innate immunity response and immunomodulatory stimulation. This investigation was designed to study the antimicrobial activities of β-defensin peptide-4 (sAvBD-4) and 10 (sAvBD-4) derived from chickens against pathogenic organisms including bacteria and fungi. Ten bacterial strains and three fungal species were used in investigation. The results showed that the sAvBD-10 displayed a higher bactericidal potency against all the tested bacterial strains than that of sAvBD-4. The exhibited bactericidal activity was significant against almost the different bacterial strains at different peptide concentrations except for that of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) and Streptococcus bovis (Str. bovis) strains where a moderate effect was noted. Both peptides were effective in the inactivation of fungal species tested yielding a killing rate of up to 95%. The results revealed that the synthetic peptides were resistant to salt at a concentration of 50 mM NaCl. However, they lost antimicrobial potency when applied in the presence of high salt concentrations. Based on blood hemolysis studies, a little hemolytic effect was showed in the case of both peptides even when applied at high concentrations. The data obtained from this study indicated that synthetic avian peptides exhibit strong antibacterial and antifungal activity. In conclusion, future work and research should be tailored to a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of those peptides and their potential use in the pharmaceutical industry to help reduce the incidence and impact of infectious agent and be marketed as a naturally occurring antibiotic.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Infective AgentsBacteriabeta-DefensinsChickensDose-Response Relationship, DrugErythrocytesFungiHemolysisMicrobial ViabilityAnti-Infective Agentsbeta-Defensinsantimicrobial activitybacteriafunginatural antibioticsynthetic AvBD-4 and 10

Identifiers

PMID25941665
PMCPMC4400880
OpenAlexW1967654691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.