Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25941663›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2015

Peptide Hydrogels - Versatile Matrices for 3D Cell Culture in Cancer Medicine.

Peter Worthington, Darrin J Pochan, Sigrid A Langhans

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Infantile hemangioma models: is the needle in a haystack?Journal of translational medicine · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Multiple Cell Cultures for MRI Analysis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Peter WorthingtonNemours Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington, DE , USA ; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware , Newark, DE , USA.
Darrin J PochanDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware , Newark, DE , USA.
Sigrid A LanghansNemours Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children , Wilmington, DE , USA.
Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children · USBiotechnology Institute · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

Center for Pediatric ResearchP20GM103464 · NIGMS · NEMOURS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, DELAWARE · PI SHAFFER, THOMAS H · 2012 to 2014
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional two-dimensional (2D) cell culture systems have contributed tremendously to our understanding of cancer biology but have significant limitations in mimicking in vivo conditions such as the tumor microenvironment. In vitro, three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models represent a more accurate, intermediate platform between simplified 2D culture models and complex and expensive in vivo models. 3D in vitro models can overcome 2D in vitro limitations caused by the oversupply of nutrients, and unphysiological cell-cell and cell-material interactions, and allow for dynamic interactions between cells, stroma, and extracellular matrix. In addition, 3D cultures allow for the development of concentration gradients, including oxygen, metabolites, and growth factors, with chemical gradients playing an integral role in many cellular functions ranging from development to signaling in normal epithelia and cancer environments in vivo. Currently, the most common matrices used for 3D culture are biologically derived materials such as matrigel and collagen. However, in recent years, more defined, synthetic materials have become available as scaffolds for 3D culture with the advantage of forming well-defined, designed, tunable materials to control matrix charge, stiffness, porosity, nanostructure, degradability, and adhesion properties, in addition to other material and biological properties. One important area of synthetic materials currently available for 3D cell culture is short sequence, self-assembling peptide hydrogels. In addition to the review of recent work toward the control of material, structure, and mechanical properties, we will also discuss the biochemical functionalization of peptide hydrogels and how this functionalization, coupled with desired hydrogel material characteristics, affects tumor cell behavior in 3D culture.

Indexed as

cancerfunctionalizationhydrogelmatrixthree-dimensional cell culture

Identifiers

PMID25941663
PMCPMC4403249
OpenAlexW2024855986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.