Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25941534›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2015

A review of study designs and statistical methods for genomic epidemiology studies using next generation sequencing.

Qian Wang, Qiongshi Lu, Hongyu Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Rare Variant inMolecular neuropsychiatry · 2016
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Role of non-coding sequence variants in cancer.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qian WangProgram of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.
Qiongshi LuDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health New Haven, CT, USA.
Hongyu ZhaoProgram of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University New Haven, CT, USA ; Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health New Haven, CT, USA ; Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center West Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

STATISTICAL METHODS TO MAP GENES FOR COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM059507 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HONGYU · 1999 to 2013
$3.6M
Lost-of-function variants in the 1000 genomes data set and implications to GWASU01HG005718 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ZHAO, HONGYU · 2010 to 2011
$533k
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG005718NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Results from numerous linkage and association studies have greatly deepened scientists' understanding of the genetic basis of many human diseases, yet some important questions remain unanswered. For example, although a large number of disease-associated loci have been identified from genome-wide association studies in the past 10 years, it is challenging to interpret these results as most disease-associated markers have no clear functional roles in disease etiology, and all the identified genomic factors only explain a small portion of disease heritability. With the help of next-generation sequencing (NGS), diverse types of genomic and epigenetic variations can be detected with high accuracy. More importantly, instead of using linkage disequilibrium to detect association signals based on a set of pre-set probes, NGS allows researchers to directly study all the variants in each individual, therefore promises opportunities for identifying functional variants and a more comprehensive dissection of disease heritability. Although the current scale of NGS studies is still limited due to the high cost, the success of several recent studies suggests the great potential for applying NGS in genomic epidemiology, especially as the cost of sequencing continues to drop. In this review, we discuss several pioneer applications of NGS, summarize scientific discoveries for rare and complex diseases, and compare various study designs including targeted sequencing and whole-genome sequencing using population-based and family-based cohorts. Finally, we highlight recent advancements in statistical methods proposed for sequencing analysis, including group-based association tests, meta-analysis techniques, and annotation tools for variant prioritization.

Indexed as

genetic etiologygenomic epidemiologynext-generation sequencingstatistical methodsstudy design

Identifiers

PMID25941534
PMCPMC4403555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.