Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25941016›Full record

Trial reportHeadache2015

AVP-825 breath-powered intranasal delivery system containing 22 mg sumatriptan powder vs 100 mg oral sumatriptan in the acute treatment of migraines (The COMPASS study): a comparative randomized clinical trial across multiple attacks.

Stewart J Tepper, Roger K Cady, Stephen Silberstein, John Messina, Ramy A Mahmoud, Per G Djupesland, Paul Shin, Joao Siffert

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Headache, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01667679 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled, Cross-Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of 20 mg Sumatriptan Powder Delivered Intranasally With the Bi-directional Device Compared With 100 mg Sumatriptan Tablets in Adults With Acute Migraine With or Without Aura), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01667679 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Active-Controlled, Cross-Over Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of 20 mg Sumatriptan Powder Delivered Intranasally With the Bi-directional Device Compared With 100 mg Sumatriptan Tablets in Adults With Acute Migraine With or Without Aura

TypeinterventionalSponsorAvanir PharmaceuticalsRan2012 to 2014Enrolled275ConditionsMigraine, HeadachesArms100 mg Sumatriptan Tablet and OPTINOSE Placebo delivered nasally, OPTINOSE SUMATRIPTAN delivered nasally and placebo tablet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Intranasal sumatriptan for acute migraine attacks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Traumatic Brain Injury and Coenzyme Q10: An Overview.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Rimegepant for the treatment of migraine.Health psychology research · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Treatment Update of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2017
    Review
  15. New treatments for headache.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Update on the Pharmacological Treatment of Chronic Migraine.Current pain and headache reports · 2016
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stewart J TepperCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Roger K CadyHeadache Care Center, Springfield, MO, USA.
Stephen SilbersteinJefferson Headache Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
John MessinaOptiNose US Inc., Yardley, PA, USA.
Ramy A MahmoudOptiNose US Inc., Yardley, PA, USA.
Per G DjupeslandOptiNose AS, Oslo, Norway.
Paul ShinAvanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Joao SiffertAvanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA, USA.
Avanir Pharmaceuticals (United States) · USHeadache Care Center · USOptiNose (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · USOptiNose (Norway) · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of AVP-825, an investigational bi-directional breath-powered intranasal delivery system containing low-dose (22 mg) sumatriptan powder, vs 100 mg oral sumatriptan for acute treatment of migraine in a double-dummy, randomized comparative efficacy clinical trial allowing treatment across multiple migraine attacks.

backgroundIn phases 2 and 3, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, AVP-825 provided early and sustained relief of moderate or severe migraine headache in adults, with a low incidence of triptan-related adverse effects.

methodsThis was a randomized, active-comparator, double-dummy, cross-over, multi-attack study (COMPASS; NCT01667679) with two ≤12-week double-blind periods. Subjects experiencing 2-8 migraines/month in the past year were randomized 1:1 using computer-generated sequences to AVP-825 plus oral placebo tablet or an identical placebo delivery system plus 100 mg oral sumatriptan tablet for the first period; patients switched treatment for the second period in this controlled comparative design. Subjects treated ≤5 qualifying migraines per period within 1 hour of onset, even if pain was mild. The primary end-point was the mean value of the summed pain intensity differences through 30 minutes post-dose (SPID-30) using Headache Severity scores. Secondary outcomes included pain relief, pain freedom, pain reduction, consistency of response across multiple migraines, migraine-associated symptoms, and atypical sensations. Safety was also assessed.

resultsA total of 275 adults were randomized, 174 (63.3%) completed the study (ie, completed the second treatment period), and 185 (67.3%) treated at least one migraine in both periods (1531 migraines assessed). There was significantly greater reduction in migraine pain intensity with AVP-825 vs oral sumatriptan in the first 30 minutes post-dose (least squares mean SPID-30 = 10.80 vs 7.41, adjusted mean difference 3.39 [95% confidence interval 1.76, 5.01]; P < .001). At each time point measured between 15 and 90 minutes, significantly greater rates of pain relief and pain freedom occurred with AVP-825 treatment compared with oral sumatriptan. At 2 hours, rates of pain relief and pain freedom became comparable; rates of sustained pain relief and sustained pain freedom from 2 to 48 hours remained comparable. Nasal discomfort and abnormal taste were more common with AVP-825 vs oral sumatriptan (16% vs 1% and 26% vs 4%, respectively), but ∼90% were mild, leading to only one discontinuation. Atypical sensation rates were significantly lower with AVP-825 than with conventional higher dose 100 mg oral sumatriptan.

conclusionsAVP-825 (containing 22 mg sumatriptan nasal powder) provided statistically significantly greater reduction of migraine pain intensity over the first 30 minutes following treatment, and greater rates of pain relief and pain freedom within 15 minutes, compared with 100 mg oral sumatriptan. Sustained pain relief and pain freedom through 24 and 48 hours was achieved in a similar percentage of attacks for both treatments, despite substantially lower total systemic drug exposure with AVP-825. Treatment was well tolerated, with statistically significantly fewer atypical sensations with AVP-825.

Indexed as

Administration, IntranasalAdministration, OralAdultCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersPowdersSerotonin 5-HT1 Receptor AgonistsSumatriptanTreatment OutcomePowdersSerotonin 5-HT1 Receptor AgonistsSumatriptanAVP-825comparative trialintranasalmigraineOptiNosesumatriptan

Identifiers

PMID25941016
PMCPMC4682470
OpenAlexW1564158486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.