Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25940605›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2016

Short-term outcomes of robotically assisted patello-femoral arthroplasty.

Ugur Turktas, Ahmet Piskin, Gary G Poehling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Surgeons and robots.International orthopaedics · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Robotics in trauma and orthopaedics.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018
    Review
  16. Inadequacy of computed tomography for pre-operative planning of patellofemoral arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2018
    Article
  17. Evidence for robots.SICOT-J · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ugur TurktasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Turgut Ozal University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey. uturktas@yahoo.com.
Ahmet PiskinDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ondokuzmayis University School of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
Gary G PoehlingDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes in patients treated with robotically assisted patello-femoral arthroplasty (PFA).

methodsThis technique offers a safe, reliable, and reproducible way of obtaining correct implant positioning in patello-femoral arthroplasty, and as a result, reduces revision surgery due to implant malalignment. We evaluated 30 knees in 29 patients who underwent robotically assisted patello-femoral arthroplasty between June 2009 and May 2011. Mean follow-up was 15.9 months. This was a retrospective study that involved chart reviews and radiographic analysis. Radiographic analysis included pre-operative and postoperative plain films for implant positioning. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion, University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) patient activity-level ratings, visual analog pain scale (VAS), and the Knee Society Score (KSS).

resultsThe patients had an average OKS of 21.7 pre-operatively and reached an average of 33.5 postoperatively (p = 0.0033). Pre-operative UCLA patient activity-level ratings was 3.1, compared with 4.8 postoperatively. Average VAS pre-operatively was 8 and postoperatively it decreased to 2.1 (p = 0.0033). The average KSS final score pre-operatively was 56 and postoperatively it increased to 68.3 while the functional score pre-operatively was 47.2 compared to 68.1 postoperatively (p = 0.011). As a result, patello-femoral arthroplasty is an emerging knee resurfacing technique that is an alternative to the total knee arthroplasty.

conclusionsThe early retrospective data for robotically-assisted PFA show encouraging results. Advantages of this technique include a smaller incision, faster rehabilitation, preservation of bone stock, and implantation without malalignment.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointKnee ProsthesisMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneePain MeasurementRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresArthroplastyOsteoarthritisPatello-femoralRobot assistedRobotically controlled

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.