Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25940563›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

Phylesystem: a git-based data store for community-curated phylogenetic estimates.

Emily Jane McTavish, Cody E Hinchliff, James F Allman, Joseph W Brown, Karen A Cranston, Mark T Holder, Jonathan A Rees, Stephen A Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A complete and dynamic tree of birds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Is variation in female aggressiveness acrossProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. More social species live longer, have longer generation times and longer reproductive windows.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic Assessment of the Contribution of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. To increase trust, change the social design behind aggregated biodiversity data.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily Jane McTavishDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg 69118, Germany.
Cody E HinchliffDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
James F AllmanInterrobang Corporation, Wake Forest, NC 27587, USA and.
Joseph W BrownDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Karen A CranstonNational Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Mark T HolderDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg 69118, Germany.
Jonathan A ReesNational Evolutionary Synthesis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Stephen A SmithDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationPhylogenetic estimates from published studies can be archived using general platforms like Dryad (Vision, 2010) or TreeBASE (Sanderson et al., 1994). Such services fulfill a crucial role in ensuring transparency and reproducibility in phylogenetic research. However, digital tree data files often require some editing (e.g. rerooting) to improve the accuracy and reusability of the phylogenetic statements. Furthermore, establishing the mapping between tip labels used in a tree and taxa in a single common taxonomy dramatically improves the ability of other researchers to reuse phylogenetic estimates. As the process of curating a published phylogenetic estimate is not error-free, retaining a full record of the provenance of edits to a tree is crucial for openness, allowing editors to receive credit for their work and making errors introduced during curation easier to correct.

resultsHere, we report the development of software infrastructure to support the open curation of phylogenetic data by the community of biologists. The backend of the system provides an interface for the standard database operations of creating, reading, updating and deleting records by making commits to a git repository. The record of the history of edits to a tree is preserved by git's version control features. Hosting this data store on GitHub (http://github.com/) provides open access to the data store using tools familiar to many developers. We have deployed a server running the 'phylesystem-api', which wraps the interactions with git and GitHub. The Open Tree of Life project has also developed and deployed a JavaScript application that uses the phylesystem-api and other web services to enable input and curation of published phylogenetic statements. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code for the web service layer is available at https://github.com/OpenTreeOfLife/phylesystem-api. The data store can be cloned from: https://github.com/OpenTreeOfLife/phylesystem. A web application that uses the phylesystem web services is deployed at http://tree.opentreeoflife.org/curator. Code for that tool is available from https://github.com/OpenTreeOfLife/opentree. CONTACT: mtholder@gmail.com.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualInformation Storage and RetrievalPhylogenySoftwareComputational BiologyHumansInternetProgramming LanguagesReproducibility of ResultsUser-Computer Interface

Identifiers

PMID25940563
PMCPMC4547614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.